REP.MC vs. TSLA
Compare and contrast key facts about Repsol (REP.MC) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA).
Performance
REP.MC vs. TSLA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Different Trading Currencies
REP.MC is traded in EUR, while TSLA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TSLA values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REP.MC achieves a 57.16% return, which is significantly higher than TSLA's -18.41% return. Over the past 10 years, REP.MC has underperformed TSLA with an annualized return of 16.83%, while TSLA has yielded a comparatively higher 35.98% annualized return.
REP.MC
- 1D
- 3.90%
- 1M
- 20.69%
- YTD
- 57.16%
- 6M
- 66.36%
- 1Y
- 128.04%
- 3Y*
- 27.17%
- 5Y*
- 25.81%
- 10Y*
- 16.83%
TSLA
- 1D
- -5.04%
- 1M
- -10.46%
- YTD
- -18.41%
- 6M
- -14.65%
- 1Y
- 29.15%
- 3Y*
- 20.47%
- 5Y*
- 10.77%
- 10Y*
- 35.98%
REP.MC vs. TSLA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REP.MC Repsol | 57.16% | 47.56% | -7.34% | -4.85% | 49.81% | 30.17% | -35.07% | 5.67% | 1.17% | 16.10% |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | -18.41% | -1.85% | 73.25% | 95.67% | -62.86% | 60.96% | 673.92% | 28.54% | 11.91% | 27.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between REP.MC and TSLA is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners. Combining low-correlation assets is one of the most reliable ways to reduce portfolio risk without sacrificing expected returns.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REP.MC vs. TSLA — Risk / Return Rank
REP.MC
TSLA
REP.MC vs. TSLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Repsol (REP.MC) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REP.MC | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.04 | 0.35 | +3.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.12 | 0.90 | +3.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.11 | +0.52 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.87 | 1.00 | +14.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 45.56 | 2.11 | +43.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REP.MC | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.04 | 0.35 | +3.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | 0.18 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.61 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.72 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
REP.MC vs. TSLA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REP.MC drawdown since its inception was -64.76%, smaller than the maximum TSLA drawdown of -71.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REP.MC and TSLA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| REP.MC | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.76% | -73.63% | +8.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -27.48% | +16.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.20% | -73.63% | +37.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.76% | -73.63% | +8.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.10% | -26.39% | +24.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.90% | -22.77% | +4.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.50% | 11.42% | -7.92% |
Volatility
REP.MC vs. TSLA - Volatility Comparison
Repsol (REP.MC) has a higher volatility of 13.03% compared to Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) at 11.21%. This indicates that REP.MC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| REP.MC | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.03% | 11.21% | +1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.16% | 30.30% | -8.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.34% | 56.87% | -28.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.84% | 58.67% | -31.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.13% | 59.01% | -28.88% |
Dividends
REP.MC vs. TSLA - Dividend Comparison
REP.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, while TSLA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REP.MC Repsol | 4.12% | 6.12% | 7.70% | 5.20% | 4.24% | 2.87% | 9.45% | 6.67% | 6.36% | 5.52% | 4.67% | 9.39% |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
REP.MC vs. TSLA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Repsol and Tesla, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities