PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REP.MC vs. AENA.MC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

REP.MC vs. AENA.MC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Repsol (REP.MC) and Aena SA (AENA.MC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REP.MC achieves a 57.16% return, which is significantly higher than AENA.MC's 10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, REP.MC has outperformed AENA.MC with an annualized return of 16.83%, while AENA.MC has yielded a comparatively lower 10.99% annualized return.


REP.MC

1D
3.90%
1M
20.69%
YTD
57.16%
6M
66.36%
1Y
128.04%
3Y*
27.17%
5Y*
25.81%
10Y*
16.83%

AENA.MC

1D
0.92%
1M
1.27%
YTD
10.16%
6M
14.89%
1Y
21.77%
3Y*
25.21%
5Y*
15.95%
10Y*
10.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REP.MC vs. AENA.MC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REP.MC
Repsol
57.16%47.56%-7.34%-4.85%49.81%30.17%-35.07%5.67%1.17%16.10%
AENA.MC
Aena SA
10.16%25.21%24.57%43.51%-15.49%-2.39%-16.60%30.05%-17.17%32.90%

Correlation

The correlation between REP.MC and AENA.MC is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners. Combining low-correlation assets is one of the most reliable ways to reduce portfolio risk without sacrificing expected returns.


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REP.MC vs. AENA.MC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REP.MC
REP.MC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
REP.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REP.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
REP.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
REP.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
REP.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

AENA.MC
AENA.MC Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
AENA.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AENA.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
AENA.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
AENA.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
AENA.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REP.MC vs. AENA.MC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Repsol (REP.MC) and Aena SA (AENA.MC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REP.MCAENA.MCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.04

1.04

+3.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.12

1.44

+2.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.20

+0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

15.87

2.20

+13.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

45.56

4.70

+40.86

REP.MC vs. AENA.MC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REP.MC Sharpe Ratio is 4.04, which is higher than the AENA.MC Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REP.MC and AENA.MC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REP.MCAENA.MCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.04

1.04

+3.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

0.69

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.41

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.54

-0.21

Drawdowns

REP.MC vs. AENA.MC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REP.MC drawdown since its inception was -64.76%, which is greater than AENA.MC's maximum drawdown of -48.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REP.MC and AENA.MC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


REP.MCAENA.MCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.76%

-48.39%

-16.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-14.59%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.20%

-33.30%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.76%

-48.39%

-16.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.10%

-8.92%

+6.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.90%

-12.30%

-5.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

6.82%

-3.32%

Volatility

REP.MC vs. AENA.MC - Volatility Comparison

Repsol (REP.MC) has a higher volatility of 13.03% compared to Aena SA (AENA.MC) at 5.02%. This indicates that REP.MC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AENA.MC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


REP.MCAENA.MCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.03%

5.02%

+8.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.16%

15.75%

+6.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.34%

21.22%

+7.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.84%

22.86%

+3.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.13%

26.42%

+3.71%

Dividends

REP.MC vs. AENA.MC - Dividend Comparison

REP.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than AENA.MC's 3.01% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REP.MC
Repsol
4.12%6.12%7.70%5.20%4.24%2.87%9.45%6.67%6.36%5.52%4.67%9.39%
AENA.MC
Aena SA
3.01%3.32%3.14%2.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.29%3.88%1.84%1.69%0.00%

Financials

REP.MC vs. AENA.MC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Repsol and Aena SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items