RENW.L vs. RAYZ.L
RENW.L (L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and RAYZ.L (Global X Solar UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Alternative Energy Equities funds - RENW.L tracks the Solactive Clean Energy Index NTR while RAYZ.L tracks the Solactive Solar v2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RENW.L returned 13.16%/yr vs -13.14%/yr for RAYZ.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RENW.L charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for RAYZ.L.
Performance
RENW.L vs. RAYZ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RENW.L achieves a 22.11% return, which is significantly higher than RAYZ.L's -11.74% return.
RENW.L
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -10.32%
- 6M
- 13.78%
- YTD
- 22.11%
- 1Y
- 44.29%
- 3Y*
- 13.16%
- 5Y*
- 5.30%
- 10Y*
- —
RAYZ.L
- 1D
- -2.79%
- 1M
- -21.34%
- 6M
- -17.20%
- YTD
- -11.74%
- 1Y
- 19.58%
- 3Y*
- -13.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RENW.L vs. RAYZ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RENW.L L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 22.11% | 51.27% | -14.25% | -8.27% | 1.88% |
RAYZ.L Global X Solar UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -11.74% | 39.95% | -28.16% | -32.65% | 4.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between RENW.L and RAYZ.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2022 | 0.63 |
The correlation between RENW.L and RAYZ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RENW.L vs. RAYZ.L — Risk / Return Rank
RENW.L
RAYZ.L
RENW.L vs. RAYZ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (RENW.L) and Global X Solar UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (RAYZ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RENW.L | RAYZ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.12 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 0.61 | +2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.46 | 2.18 | +7.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RENW.L vs. RAYZ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RENW.L drawdown since its inception was -48.58%, smaller than the maximum RAYZ.L drawdown of -69.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RENW.L and RAYZ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RENW.L | RAYZ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.58% | -69.13% | +20.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.56% | -31.77% | +15.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.48% | -56.80% | +24.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.56% | -52.81% | +36.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.61% | -40.53% | +16.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.67% | 8.98% | -4.31% |
Volatility
RENW.L vs. RAYZ.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (RENW.L) is 8.97%, while Global X Solar UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (RAYZ.L) has a volatility of 11.58%. This indicates that RENW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RAYZ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RENW.L | RAYZ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.97% | 11.58% | -2.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.81% | 25.75% | -4.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.96% | 34.35% | -8.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.75% | 34.25% | -9.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.98% | 34.25% | -9.27% |
RENW.L vs. RAYZ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
RENW.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than RAYZ.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
RENW.L vs. RAYZ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither RENW.L nor RAYZ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
RENW.L and RAYZ.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RENW.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RENW.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RAYZ.L.
RENW.L tracks Solactive Clean Energy Index NTR, while RAYZ.L tracks Solactive Solar v2 Index. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for RENW.L and 0.50% for RAYZ.L.
Find the right allocation for RENW.L and RAYZ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer