RENW.L vs. FLES.L
RENW.L (L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF) and FLES.L (Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - RENW.L tracks the L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF while FLES.L tracks the Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RENW.L returned 5.60%/yr vs 1.62%/yr for FLES.L. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RENW.L vs. FLES.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
RENW.L is traded in USD, while FLES.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the FLES.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RENW.L achieves a 23.89% return, which is significantly higher than FLES.L's -1.49% return.
RENW.L
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -8.42%
- 6M
- 17.61%
- YTD
- 23.89%
- 1Y
- 47.17%
- 3Y*
- 14.14%
- 5Y*
- 5.60%
- 10Y*
- —
FLES.L
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- 6M
- -0.68%
- YTD
- -1.49%
- 1Y
- 0.66%
- 3Y*
- 3.92%
- 5Y*
- 1.62%
- 10Y*
- —
RENW.L vs. FLES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RENW.L L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF | 23.89% | 51.27% | -14.25% | -8.27% | -8.82% | -7.46% | 24.52% |
FLES.L Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF | -1.49% | 16.13% | -2.23% | 6.56% | -5.88% | -6.70% | 3.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between RENW.L and FLES.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2020 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RENW.L vs. FLES.L — Risk / Return Rank
RENW.L
FLES.L
RENW.L vs. FLES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENW.L) and Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF (FLES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RENW.L | FLES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.02 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 0.13 | +2.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.60 | 0.28 | +10.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RENW.L vs. FLES.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RENW.L drawdown since its inception was -48.58%, which is greater than FLES.L's maximum drawdown of -22.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RENW.L and FLES.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RENW.L | FLES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.58% | -22.21% | -26.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.66% | -5.08% | -10.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.48% | -7.56% | -24.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.77% | -19.33% | -24.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.34% | -3.98% | -11.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.62% | -6.60% | -17.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.54% | 2.39% | +2.15% |
Volatility
RENW.L vs. FLES.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF (RENW.L) has a higher volatility of 8.94% compared to Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF (FLES.L) at 1.61%. This indicates that RENW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RENW.L | FLES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.94% | 1.61% | +7.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.76% | 4.56% | +16.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.93% | 6.22% | +19.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.75% | 7.64% | +17.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.98% | 7.25% | +17.73% |
Dividends
RENW.L vs. FLES.L - Dividend Comparison
RENW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLES.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLES.L Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF | 1.92% | 2.62% | 2.55% | 1.20% | 0.26% |
RENW.L L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RENW.L and FLES.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RENW.L tracks L&G Clean Energy UCITS ETF, while FLES.L tracks Franklin Euro Short Maturity UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Franklin.
Find the right allocation for RENW.L and FLES.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer