RAYZ.L vs. MINT.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

RAYZ.L (Global X Solar UCITS ETF) and MINT.L (PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - RAYZ.L tracks the Global X Solar UCITS ETF while MINT.L tracks the PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RAYZ.L returned -11.91%/yr vs 5.23%/yr for MINT.L. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RAYZ.L vs. MINT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Solar UCITS ETF (RAYZ.L) and PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAYZ.L achieves a -8.49% return, which is significantly lower than MINT.L's 2.39% return.

RAYZ.L

• 1D: -1.55%
• 1M: -17.91%
• 6M: -13.34%
• YTD: -8.49%
• 1Y: 23.69%
• 3Y*: -11.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MINT.L

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.39%
• 6M: 2.17%
• YTD: 2.39%
• 1Y: 4.58%
• 3Y*: 5.23%
• 5Y*: 3.49%
• 10Y*: 2.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RAYZ.L vs. MINT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
RAYZ.L Global X Solar UCITS ETF	-8.49%	39.95%	-28.16%	-32.65%	4.13%
MINT.L PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF	2.39%	4.66%	5.75%	5.72%	-0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between RAYZ.L and MINT.L is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2022	0.02

The correlation between RAYZ.L and MINT.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RAYZ.L vs. MINT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAYZ.L

RAYZ.L Risk / Return Rank: 25
RAYZ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
RAYZ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
RAYZ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 24
RAYZ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
RAYZ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 26

MINT.L

MINT.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
MINT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MINT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
MINT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
MINT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MINT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAYZ.L vs. MINT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Solar UCITS ETF (RAYZ.L) and PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RAYZ.L	MINT.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.73	7.86	-7.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	16.90	-15.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	3.57	-2.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.85	45.35	-44.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.86	232.26	-229.41

RAYZ.L vs. MINT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RAYZ.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the MINT.L Sharpe Ratio of 7.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RAYZ.L and MINT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RAYZ.L vs. MINT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAYZ.L drawdown since its inception was -69.13%, which is greater than MINT.L's maximum drawdown of -3.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAYZ.L and MINT.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	RAYZ.L	MINT.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.13%	-3.89%	-65.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.26%	-0.10%	-29.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-57.14%	-0.62%	-56.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-2.47%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-3.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.07%	0.00%	-51.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.52%	-0.23%	-40.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.75%	0.02%	+8.73%

Volatility

RAYZ.L vs. MINT.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Solar UCITS ETF (RAYZ.L) has a higher volatility of 11.41% compared to PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L) at 0.14%. This indicates that RAYZ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RAYZ.L	MINT.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.41%	0.14%	+11.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.55%	0.35%	+25.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.21%	0.58%	+33.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.23%	0.76%	+33.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.23%	0.95%	+33.28%

Dividends

RAYZ.L vs. MINT.L - Dividend Comparison

RAYZ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MINT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MINT.L PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF	4.36%	4.43%	5.18%	4.81%	1.51%	0.34%	1.17%	2.63%	2.33%	1.56%	1.31%	0.79%
RAYZ.L Global X Solar UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RAYZ.L and MINT.L in my portfolio?

RAYZ.L and MINT.L have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between RAYZ.L and MINT.L?

RAYZ.L tracks Global X Solar UCITS ETF, while MINT.L tracks PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: Global X and PIMCO.