REMX vs. REXC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

REMX (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF) and REXC (Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF) are both Rare Earth & Strategic Metals funds - REMX tracks the MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index while REXC tracks the Nasdaq Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. REMX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for REXC.

Performance

REMX vs. REXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF (REXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

REMX

• 1D: -5.62%
• 1M: -5.16%
• YTD: 24.22%
• 6M: 22.61%
• 1Y: 139.49%
• 3Y*: 5.61%
• 5Y*: 4.37%
• 10Y*: 10.09%

REXC

• 1D: -4.04%
• 1M: -6.45%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REMX vs. REXC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF	-7.06%
REXC Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF	0.74%

Correlation

The correlation between REMX and REXC is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2026	0.84

Return for Risk

REMX vs. REXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REMX

REMX Risk / Return Rank: 80
REMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
REMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
REMX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
REMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
REMX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

REXC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REMX vs. REXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF (REXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	REMX	REXC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.81	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.10	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.01	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.83	—	—

Drawdowns

REMX vs. REXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REMX drawdown since its inception was -90.20%, which is greater than REXC's maximum drawdown of -21.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMX and REXC.

Drawdown Indicators

	REMX	REXC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.20%	-21.22%	-68.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-62.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-73.34%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.95%	-13.80%	-44.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.82%	-7.18%	-59.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.85%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	REMX	REXC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.71%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.35%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.97%	53.79%	-3.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.71%	53.79%	-13.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.16%	53.79%	-16.63%

REMX vs. REXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

REMX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than REXC's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

REMX vs. REXC - Dividend Comparison

REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, while REXC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF	1.42%	1.76%	2.56%	0.00%	1.56%	5.25%	0.81%	1.64%	12.43%	2.89%	2.23%	4.77%
REXC Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both REMX and REXC in my portfolio?

REMX and REXC have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, REMX or REXC?

On fees, REMX is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, REMX or REXC?

REMX is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for REXC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, REMX or REXC?

REMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.00% for REXC.

What is the main difference between REMX and REXC?

REMX tracks MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index, while REXC tracks Nasdaq Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for REMX and 0.65% for REXC.