REMX vs. METL
REMX (VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF) and METL (Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REMX is a Materials fund tracking the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index, while METL is a Commodity Producers Equities fund actively managed by Sprott. REMX is passively managed, while METL is actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. REMX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for METL.
Performance
REMX vs. METL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REMX achieves a 33.01% return, which is significantly higher than METL's 18.34% return.
REMX
- 1D
- -3.78%
- 1M
- -3.72%
- YTD
- 33.01%
- 6M
- 37.14%
- 1Y
- 172.35%
- 3Y*
- 6.84%
- 5Y*
- 4.50%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
METL
- 1D
- -3.81%
- 1M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- 18.34%
- 6M
- 25.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REMX vs. METL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
REMX VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF | 33.01% | 31.24% |
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 18.34% | 27.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between REMX and METL is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REMX vs. METL — Risk / Return Rank
REMX
METL
REMX vs. METL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REMX | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.61 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.66 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.43 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.32 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REMX | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.08 | 1.72 | -1.80 |
Drawdowns
REMX vs. METL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REMX drawdown since its inception was -90.20%, which is greater than METL's maximum drawdown of -27.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMX and METL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REMX | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.20% | -27.39% | -62.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.98% | -10.27% | -44.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.87% | -8.11% | -58.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.12% | — | — |
Volatility
REMX vs. METL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REMX | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.02% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.77% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.11% | 43.94% | +4.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.24% | 43.94% | -3.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.94% | 43.94% | -7.00% |
REMX vs. METL - Expense Ratio Comparison
REMX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than METL's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
REMX vs. METL - Dividend Comparison
REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, more than METL's 0.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 0.84% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REMX VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF | 1.32% | 1.76% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 5.25% | 0.81% | 1.64% | 12.43% | 2.89% | 2.23% | 4.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REMX and METL have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, REMX is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
REMX is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for METL.
REMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.84% for METL.
REMX is categorized as Materials, while METL is Commodity Producers Equities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for REMX and 0.89% for METL.
Find the right allocation for REMX and METL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer