REMX vs. ISCMF
REMX (VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REMX is a Materials fund tracking the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, REMX returned 8.22%/yr vs 15.20%/yr for ISCMF. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. REMX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.
Performance
REMX vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REMX achieves a 38.23% return, which is significantly higher than ISCMF's 22.87% return.
REMX
- 1D
- 2.75%
- 1M
- -4.07%
- YTD
- 38.23%
- 6M
- 42.20%
- 1Y
- 188.69%
- 3Y*
- 8.22%
- 5Y*
- 5.89%
- 10Y*
- 10.56%
ISCMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- 22.87%
- 6M
- 27.76%
- 1Y
- 37.85%
- 3Y*
- 15.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REMX vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REMX VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF | 38.23% | 92.95% | -35.02% | -19.18% | -26.30% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 22.87% | 19.65% | 3.13% | -9.58% | -5.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between REMX and ISCMF is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2022 | -0.02 |
The correlation between REMX and ISCMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REMX vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank
REMX
ISCMF
REMX vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REMX | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.96 | 2.05 | +1.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.88 | 3.74 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 2.53 | -1.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.93 | 6.66 | +1.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.90 | 15.79 | +7.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REMX | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.96 | 2.05 | +1.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 0.45 | -0.52 |
Drawdowns
REMX vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REMX drawdown since its inception was -90.20%, which is greater than ISCMF's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMX and ISCMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REMX | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.20% | -25.42% | -64.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.35% | -5.69% | -17.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.11% | -7.62% | -54.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.21% | -5.26% | -47.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.87% | -13.44% | -53.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.09% | 2.40% | +5.69% |
Volatility
REMX vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has a higher volatility of 13.13% compared to iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) at 7.14%. This indicates that REMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REMX | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.13% | 7.14% | +5.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.60% | 15.90% | +18.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.95% | 18.53% | +29.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.21% | 14.38% | +25.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.92% | 14.38% | +22.54% |
REMX vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
REMX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
REMX vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison
REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REMX VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF | 1.27% | 1.76% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 5.25% | 0.81% | 1.64% | 12.43% | 2.89% | 2.23% | 4.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REMX and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
REMX has higher volatility (13.13%) compared to ISCMF (7.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REMX dropped -90.20% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.
On 3-year performance, ISCMF leads with 15.20% vs 8.22% for REMX. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ISCMF has been the lower-risk option at 7.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ISCMF has performed better with a 15.20% return vs 8.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REMX.
REMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.
REMX is categorized as Materials, while ISCMF is Commodities. REMX tracks MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index, while ISCMF tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for REMX and 0.19% for ISCMF.
REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.96 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REMX and ISCMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer