PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REMX vs. ISCMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REMX vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REMX achieves a 38.23% return, which is significantly higher than ISCMF's 22.87% return.


REMX

1D
2.75%
1M
-4.07%
YTD
38.23%
6M
42.20%
1Y
188.69%
3Y*
8.22%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
10.56%

ISCMF

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.67%
YTD
22.87%
6M
27.76%
1Y
37.85%
3Y*
15.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REMX vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
REMX
VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF
38.23%92.95%-35.02%-19.18%-26.30%
ISCMF
iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF
22.87%19.65%3.13%-9.58%-5.08%

Correlation

The correlation between REMX and ISCMF is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2022

-0.02

The correlation between REMX and ISCMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REMX vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REMX
REMX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
REMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
REMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
REMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
REMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCMF
ISCMF Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ISCMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCMF Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCMF Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REMX vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REMXISCMFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.96

2.05

+1.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.88

3.74

+0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

2.53

-1.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.93

6.66

+1.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

22.90

15.79

+7.11

REMX vs. ISCMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.96, which is higher than the ISCMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REMX and ISCMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REMXISCMFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.96

2.05

+1.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.07

0.45

-0.52

Drawdowns

REMX vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REMX drawdown since its inception was -90.20%, which is greater than ISCMF's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMX and ISCMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REMXISCMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.20%

-25.42%

-64.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.35%

-5.69%

-17.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.11%

-7.62%

-54.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.21%

-5.26%

-47.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.87%

-13.44%

-53.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.09%

2.40%

+5.69%

Volatility

REMX vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has a higher volatility of 13.13% compared to iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) at 7.14%. This indicates that REMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REMXISCMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.13%

7.14%

+5.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.60%

15.90%

+18.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.95%

18.53%

+29.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.21%

14.38%

+25.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.92%

14.38%

+22.54%

REMX vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

REMX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

REMX vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison

REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISCMF
iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
REMX
VanEck Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF
1.27%1.76%2.56%0.00%1.56%5.25%0.81%1.64%12.43%2.89%2.23%4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


REMX and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REMX has higher volatility (13.13%) compared to ISCMF (7.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REMX dropped -90.20% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.

On 3-year performance, ISCMF leads with 15.20% vs 8.22% for REMX. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ISCMF has been the lower-risk option at 7.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ISCMF has performed better with a 15.20% return vs 8.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REMX.

REMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.

REMX is categorized as Materials, while ISCMF is Commodities. REMX tracks MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index, while ISCMF tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for REMX and 0.19% for ISCMF.

REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.96 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REMX and ISCMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer