PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REMX vs. GDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REMX vs. GDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REMX achieves a -8.51% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -11.33% return. Over the past 10 years, REMX has underperformed GDX with an annualized return of 5.71%, while GDX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.74% annualized return.


REMX

1D
2.52%
1M
-22.01%
6M
-20.26%
YTD
-8.51%
1Y
39.51%
3Y*
-4.05%
5Y*
-7.38%
10Y*
5.71%
ALL TIME*
-5.20%

GDX

1D
2.63%
1M
-3.03%
6M
-19.26%
YTD
-11.33%
1Y
46.05%
3Y*
38.64%
5Y*
18.57%
10Y*
10.74%
ALL TIME*
4.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.27B$1.28B$1.79B
$46.30M$55.44M$85.35M

REMX vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
-8.51%92.95%-35.02%-19.18%-31.13%79.81%64.82%0.74%-49.63%82.60%
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
-11.33%154.77%10.63%9.98%-9.01%-9.52%23.66%39.84%-8.77%11.99%

Correlation

The correlation between REMX and GDX is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2010

0.30

Over the past year, REMX and GDX have become more correlated (0.51) than their long-term average of 0.30, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REMX vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

REMX
REMX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
REMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
REMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
REMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
REMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

GDX
GDX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

REMX vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REMXGDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.19

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

1.19

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.93

2.55

+0.38

REMX vs. GDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is comparable to the GDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REMX and GDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REMX vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REMX drawdown since its inception was -90.20%, which is greater than GDX's maximum drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMX and GDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REMXGDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.20%

-80.34%

-9.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.03%

-38.93%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.11%

-38.93%

-19.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.34%

-46.51%

-26.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.34%

-49.79%

-23.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.03%

-34.35%

-34.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.81%

-40.37%

-26.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.50%

18.10%

-4.60%

Volatility

REMX vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) have volatilities of 12.38% and 12.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REMXGDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.38%

12.19%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.40%

37.71%

-1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.95%

48.63%

+1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.59%

37.26%

+3.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.32%

37.36%

-0.04%

REMX vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

REMX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

REMX vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison

REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, more than GDX's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
0.83%0.74%1.19%1.61%1.66%1.67%0.53%0.67%0.50%0.76%0.26%0.85%
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
1.92%1.76%2.56%0.00%1.56%5.25%0.81%1.64%12.43%2.89%2.23%4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


REMX and GDX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REMX has higher volatility (12.38%) compared to GDX (12.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REMX dropped -90.20% vs GDX's -80.34%.

On 10-year performance, GDX leads with 10.74% vs 5.71% for REMX. On fees, GDX is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, GDX has been the lower-risk option at 12.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GDX has performed better with a 10.74% return vs 5.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDX is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REMX.

REMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.92%, compared with 0.83% for GDX.

REMX is categorized as Rare Earth & Strategic Metals, while GDX is Gold. REMX tracks MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for REMX and 0.51% for GDX.

GDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REMX and GDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer