REMX vs. ESPO
REMX (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF) and ESPO (VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REMX is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index, while ESPO is a Gaming fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, REMX returned -5.34%/yr vs 7.15%/yr for ESPO. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. REMX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ESPO.
Performance
REMX vs. ESPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REMX achieves a -5.51% return, which is significantly higher than ESPO's -11.58% return.
REMX
- 1D
- -3.88%
- 1M
- -26.90%
- 6M
- -21.68%
- YTD
- -5.51%
- 1Y
- 39.98%
- 3Y*
- -4.09%
- 5Y*
- -5.34%
- 10Y*
- 6.10%
- ALL TIME*
- -5.02%
ESPO
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 3.78%
- 6M
- -13.33%
- YTD
- -11.58%
- 1Y
- -14.95%
- 3Y*
- 18.26%
- 5Y*
- 7.15%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.24%
REMX vs. ESPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | -5.51% | 92.95% | -35.02% | -19.18% | -31.13% | 79.81% | 64.82% | 0.74% | -18.17% |
ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF | -11.58% | 25.79% | 47.61% | 33.64% | -34.71% | -2.13% | 83.93% | 42.36% | -12.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between REMX and ESPO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.48 |
The correlation between REMX and ESPO shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
REMX vs. ESPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
REMX
ESPO
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
REMX
ESPO
-
Communication Services
REMX
-
ESPO
Consumer Cyclical
REMX
-
ESPO
Consumer Defensive
REMX
-
ESPO
-
Energy
REMX
-
ESPO
-
Financial Services
REMX
-
ESPO
-
Healthcare
REMX
-
ESPO
-
Industrials
REMX
-
ESPO
-
Real Estate
REMX
-
ESPO
-
Technology
REMX
-
ESPO
Utilities
REMX
-
ESPO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REMX vs. ESPO — Risk / Return Rank
REMX
ESPO
REMX vs. ESPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REMX | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.88 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | -0.51 | +1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.56 | -0.84 | +4.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REMX vs. ESPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REMX drawdown since its inception was -90.20%, which is greater than ESPO's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMX and ESPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REMX | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.20% | -50.99% | -39.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.23% | -29.43% | -6.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.68% | -29.43% | -30.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.34% | -48.33% | -25.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.01% | -24.17% | -43.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.80% | -15.19% | -51.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.26% | 17.77% | -6.51% |
Volatility
REMX vs. ESPO - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has a higher volatility of 11.40% compared to VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) at 4.77%. This indicates that REMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REMX | ESPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.40% | 4.77% | +6.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.34% | 15.06% | +22.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.96% | 18.71% | +31.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.69% | 25.09% | +15.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.26% | 25.61% | +11.65% |
REMX vs. ESPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
REMX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ESPO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
REMX vs. ESPO - Dividend Comparison
REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, more than ESPO's 1.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF | 1.41% | 1.24% | 0.44% | 0.96% | 0.91% | 3.36% | 0.12% | 0.22% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 1.86% | 1.76% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 5.25% | 0.81% | 1.64% | 12.43% | 2.89% | 2.23% | 4.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REMX and ESPO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
REMX has higher volatility (11.40%) compared to ESPO (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REMX dropped -90.20% vs ESPO's -50.99%.
On 5-year performance, ESPO leads with 7.15% vs -5.34% for REMX. On fees, ESPO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, ESPO has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ESPO has performed better with a 7.15% return vs -5.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESPO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REMX.
REMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.41% for ESPO.
REMX is categorized as Rare Earth & Strategic Metals, while ESPO is Gaming. REMX tracks MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index, while ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for REMX and 0.55% for ESPO.
REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REMX and ESPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer