PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REMX.L vs. UC15.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REMX.L vs. UC15.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF (REMX.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

REMX.L is traded in USD, while UC15.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UC15.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REMX.L achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly lower than UC15.L's 21.34% return.


REMX.L

1D
-1.68%
1M
-23.14%
6M
-17.06%
YTD
2.13%
1Y
60.74%
3Y*
-3.25%
5Y*
10Y*

UC15.L

1D
0.78%
1M
3.66%
6M
17.89%
YTD
21.34%
1Y
27.74%
3Y*
11.57%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
8.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REMX.L vs. UC15.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
REMX.L
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF
2.13%88.79%-35.65%-18.38%-30.93%7.28%
UC15.L
UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
21.34%10.01%4.66%-1.58%16.07%5.44%

Correlation

The correlation between REMX.L and UC15.L is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021

0.26

The correlation between REMX.L and UC15.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REMX.L vs. UC15.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REMX.L
REMX.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
REMX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REMX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
REMX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
REMX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
REMX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

UC15.L
UC15.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
UC15.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC15.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC15.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
UC15.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC15.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REMX.L vs. UC15.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF (REMX.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REMX.LUC15.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.36

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

2.69

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.64

9.30

-3.66

REMX.L vs. UC15.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REMX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the UC15.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REMX.L and UC15.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REMX.L vs. UC15.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REMX.L drawdown since its inception was -73.21%, smaller than the maximum UC15.L drawdown of -98.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMX.L and UC15.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REMX.LUC15.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.21%

-98.90%

+25.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.73%

-10.27%

-21.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.69%

-22.29%

-38.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.14%

-4.13%

-35.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.58%

-22.14%

-19.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.86%

2.98%

+7.88%

Volatility

REMX.L vs. UC15.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF (REMX.L) has a higher volatility of 11.26% compared to UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) at 4.00%. This indicates that REMX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC15.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REMX.LUC15.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.26%

4.00%

+7.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.16%

11.40%

+22.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.91%

13.23%

+33.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.71%

19.82%

+34.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.71%

17.19%

+37.52%

REMX.L vs. UC15.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

REMX.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than UC15.L's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

REMX.L vs. UC15.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither REMX.L nor UC15.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


REMX.L and UC15.L have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UC15.L is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UC15.L is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REMX.L.

REMX.L tracks VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF, while UC15.L tracks UBS CMCI. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for REMX.L and 0.34% for UC15.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REMX.L and UC15.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer