REMSX vs. FPADX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

REMSX (Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund) and FPADX (Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 10 years, REMSX returned 9.79%/yr vs 10.42%/yr for FPADX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. REMSX charges 1.19%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for FPADX.

Performance

REMSX vs. FPADX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund (REMSX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with REMSX having a 30.54% return and FPADX slightly lower at 30.04%. Over the past 10 years, REMSX has underperformed FPADX with an annualized return of 9.79%, while FPADX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.42% annualized return.

REMSX

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 10.12%
• YTD: 30.54%
• 6M: 32.55%
• 1Y: 58.85%
• 3Y*: 25.17%
• 5Y*: 7.75%
• 10Y*: 9.79%

FPADX

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: 10.70%
• YTD: 30.04%
• 6M: 32.95%
• 1Y: 58.94%
• 3Y*: 24.97%
• 5Y*: 7.99%
• 10Y*: 10.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REMSX vs. FPADX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
REMSX Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund	30.54%	33.98%	8.16%	8.37%	-22.59%	0.75%	9.85%	19.11%	-16.74%	35.45%
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund	30.04%	33.90%	6.80%	9.51%	-20.06%	-3.07%	17.84%	18.28%	-14.65%	35.16%

Correlation

The correlation between REMSX and FPADX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2011	0.95

The correlation between REMSX and FPADX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

REMSX vs. FPADX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REMSX

REMSX Risk / Return Rank: 90
REMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
REMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
REMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
REMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
REMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

FPADX

FPADX Risk / Return Rank: 90
FPADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FPADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FPADX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FPADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FPADX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REMSX vs. FPADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund (REMSX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	REMSX	FPADX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.48	3.34	+0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.38	4.23	+0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	1.62	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.30	4.48	-0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.97	17.77	-0.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

REMSX vs. FPADX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REMSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.48, which is comparable to the FPADX Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REMSX and FPADX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	REMSX	FPADX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.48	3.34	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.47	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.59	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.37	-0.08

Drawdowns

REMSX vs. FPADX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REMSX drawdown since its inception was -66.80%, which is greater than FPADX's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMSX and FPADX.

Drawdown Indicators

	REMSX	FPADX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.80%	-39.16%	-27.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.87%	-13.28%	-0.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.56%	-16.09%	-0.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.33%	-37.00%	-0.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.09%	-39.16%	-1.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.35%	-13.26%	-6.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.51%	3.34%	+0.17%

Volatility

REMSX vs. FPADX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund (REMSX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) have volatilities of 7.30% and 7.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	REMSX	FPADX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.30%	7.57%	-0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.65%	15.40%	-0.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.16%	17.80%	-0.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.51%	17.11%	-0.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.35%	17.82%	-0.47%

REMSX vs. FPADX - Expense Ratio Comparison

REMSX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FPADX's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

REMSX vs. FPADX - Dividend Comparison

REMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than FPADX's 1.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund	1.81%	2.35%	2.70%	2.68%	2.47%	2.14%	1.50%	2.59%	2.20%	0.12%	1.69%	2.47%
REMSX Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund	1.51%	1.97%	2.58%	2.42%	2.17%	14.04%	0.59%	2.51%	4.57%	1.10%	1.08%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both REMSX and FPADX in my portfolio?

REMSX and FPADX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, REMSX or FPADX?

FPADX has higher volatility (7.57%) compared to REMSX (7.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REMSX dropped -66.80% vs FPADX's -39.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

REMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.48 vs 3.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.