PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REMSX vs. RMYYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REMSX vs. RMYYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund (REMSX) and Russell Investments Multi-Strategy Income Fund (RMYYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REMSX achieves a 16.06% return, which is significantly higher than RMYYX's 5.76% return. Over the past 10 years, REMSX has outperformed RMYYX with an annualized return of 7.63%, while RMYYX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.09% annualized return.


REMSX

1D
3.01%
1M
-4.52%
6M
5.98%
YTD
16.06%
1Y
34.48%
3Y*
17.76%
5Y*
6.56%
10Y*
7.63%
ALL TIME*
5.05%

RMYYX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.19%
6M
3.22%
YTD
5.76%
1Y
12.71%
3Y*
9.82%
5Y*
4.56%
10Y*
5.09%
ALL TIME*
5.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

REMSX vs. RMYYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REMSX
Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund
16.06%33.98%8.16%8.37%-22.59%0.75%9.85%19.11%-16.74%35.45%
RMYYX
Russell Investments Multi-Strategy Income Fund
5.76%14.24%5.64%11.56%-13.78%9.06%3.64%10.35%-3.39%9.17%

Correlation

The correlation between REMSX and RMYYX is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.66

The correlation between REMSX and RMYYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REMSX vs. RMYYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

REMSX
REMSX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
REMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
REMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
REMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
REMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

RMYYX
RMYYX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
RMYYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMYYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMYYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
RMYYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMYYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

REMSX vs. RMYYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund (REMSX) and Russell Investments Multi-Strategy Income Fund (RMYYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REMSXRMYYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.43

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

2.24

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.96

8.20

-1.23

REMSX vs. RMYYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the RMYYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REMSX and RMYYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REMSX vs. RMYYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REMSX drawdown since its inception was -66.80%, which is greater than RMYYX's maximum drawdown of -21.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMSX and RMYYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REMSXRMYYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.80%

-21.79%

-45.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.87%

-5.65%

-8.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.56%

-7.56%

-9.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.84%

-21.75%

-13.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.09%

-21.79%

-19.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.26%

-0.13%

-11.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.28%

-3.63%

-15.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.45%

1.54%

+2.91%

Volatility

REMSX vs. RMYYX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund (REMSX) has a higher volatility of 9.44% compared to Russell Investments Multi-Strategy Income Fund (RMYYX) at 1.29%. This indicates that REMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMYYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REMSXRMYYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.44%

1.29%

+8.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.68%

4.66%

+15.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.59%

5.59%

+16.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.44%

8.79%

+8.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.71%

8.56%

+9.15%

REMSX vs. RMYYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

REMSX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than RMYYX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

REMSX vs. RMYYX - Dividend Comparison

REMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than RMYYX's 3.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REMSX
Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund
1.70%1.97%2.58%2.42%2.17%14.04%0.59%2.51%4.57%1.10%1.08%0.13%
RMYYX
Russell Investments Multi-Strategy Income Fund
3.81%4.10%5.57%5.20%4.02%5.89%1.52%3.60%3.83%3.42%4.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


REMSX and RMYYX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REMSX has higher volatility (9.44%) compared to RMYYX (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REMSX dropped -66.80% vs RMYYX's -21.79%.

RMYYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REMSX and RMYYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer