REMSX vs. FEMSX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

REMSX (Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund) and FEMSX (Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, REMSX returned 7.63%/yr vs 11.35%/yr for FEMSX. Their correlation of 0.95 means they have usually moved in the same direction. REMSX charges 1.19%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for FEMSX.

Performance

REMSX vs. FEMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund (REMSX) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REMSX achieves a 16.06% return, which is significantly lower than FEMSX's 20.45% return. Over the past 10 years, REMSX has underperformed FEMSX with an annualized return of 7.63%, while FEMSX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.35% annualized return.

REMSX

• 1D: 3.01%
• 1M: -4.52%
• 6M: 5.98%
• YTD: 16.06%
• 1Y: 34.48%
• 3Y*: 17.76%
• 5Y*: 6.56%
• 10Y*: 7.63%
• ALL TIME*: 5.05%

FEMSX

• 1D: 4.14%
• 1M: -3.48%
• 6M: 9.96%
• YTD: 20.45%
• 1Y: 42.08%
• 3Y*: 21.01%
• 5Y*: 8.08%
• 10Y*: 11.35%
• ALL TIME*: 10.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FEMSX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
REMSX Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

REMSX vs. FEMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
REMSX Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund	16.06%	33.98%	8.16%	8.37%	-22.59%	0.75%	9.85%	19.11%	-16.74%	35.45%
FEMSX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund	20.45%	37.92%	7.84%	14.23%	-23.95%	-5.14%	24.72%	28.87%	-16.20%	49.92%

Correlation

The correlation between REMSX and FEMSX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2008	0.95

The correlation between REMSX and FEMSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

REMSX vs. FEMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

REMSX

REMSX Risk / Return Rank: 54
REMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
REMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
REMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
REMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
REMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

FEMSX

FEMSX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FEMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FEMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FEMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FEMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FEMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

REMSX vs. FEMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund (REMSX) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	REMSX	FEMSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	1.66	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	2.18	-0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.31	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.24	2.94	-0.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.96	9.26	-2.29

REMSX vs. FEMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the FEMSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REMSX and FEMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

REMSX vs. FEMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REMSX drawdown since its inception was -66.80%, which is greater than FEMSX's maximum drawdown of -44.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMSX and FEMSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	REMSX	FEMSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.80%	-44.16%	-22.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.87%	-13.47%	-0.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.56%	-17.04%	+0.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.84%	-39.12%	+4.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.09%	-44.16%	+3.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.26%	-9.89%	-1.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.28%	-13.34%	-5.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.45%	4.27%	+0.18%

Volatility

REMSX vs. FEMSX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund (REMSX) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX) have volatilities of 9.44% and 9.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	REMSX	FEMSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.44%	9.64%	-0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.68%	21.81%	-2.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.59%	23.84%	-2.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.44%	19.97%	-2.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.71%	19.75%	-2.04%

REMSX vs. FEMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

REMSX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FEMSX's 0.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

REMSX vs. FEMSX - Dividend Comparison

REMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than FEMSX's 2.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FEMSX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund	2.03%	2.45%	2.08%	2.82%	2.39%	12.83%	2.99%	2.48%	9.42%	8.98%	1.46%	1.27%
REMSX Russell Investments Emerging Markets Fund	1.70%	1.97%	2.58%	2.42%	2.17%	14.04%	0.59%	2.51%	4.57%	1.10%	1.08%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both REMSX and FEMSX in my portfolio?

REMSX and FEMSX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, REMSX or FEMSX?

FEMSX has higher volatility (9.64%) compared to REMSX (9.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REMSX dropped -66.80% vs FEMSX's -44.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FEMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.