PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REMC vs. CRUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REMC vs. CRUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (REMC) and Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


REMC

1D
0.22%
1M
2.40%
6M
11.23%
YTD
11.94%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CRUX

1D
0.03%
1M
0.43%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REMC vs. CRUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between REMC and CRUX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026

0.66

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REMC vs. CRUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (REMC) and Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

REMC vs. CRUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REMC vs. CRUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REMC drawdown since its inception was -6.64%, which is greater than CRUX's maximum drawdown of -1.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMC and CRUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REMCCRUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.64%

-1.85%

-4.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.57%

+0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.46%

-0.56%

-0.90%

Volatility

REMC vs. CRUX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REMCCRUXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.25%

4.08%

+8.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.25%

4.08%

+8.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.25%

4.08%

+8.17%

REMC vs. CRUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both REMC and CRUX have an expense ratio of 0.32%.


Dividends

REMC vs. CRUX - Dividend Comparison

REMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than CRUX's 1.39% yield.


PositionTTM2025
CRUX
Columbia Core Bond ETF
1.39%0.00%
REMC
Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF
0.07%0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


REMC and CRUX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.32% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

REMC and CRUX have the same expense ratio: 0.32% per year.

CRUX has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.07% for REMC.

REMC is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while CRUX is Intermediate Core Bond.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REMC and CRUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer