RELVX vs. RFBSX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RELVX (Russell Investments LifePoints Equity Growth Strategy Fund) and RFBSX (Russell Investments Short Duration Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - RELVX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Russell, while RFBSX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Russell. Over the past 10 years, RELVX returned 9.59%/yr vs 2.27%/yr for RFBSX. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. RELVX charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for RFBSX.

Performance

RELVX vs. RFBSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments LifePoints Equity Growth Strategy Fund (RELVX) and Russell Investments Short Duration Bond Fund (RFBSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RELVX achieves a 10.07% return, which is significantly higher than RFBSX's 0.67% return. Over the past 10 years, RELVX has outperformed RFBSX with an annualized return of 9.59%, while RFBSX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.27% annualized return.

RELVX

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.99%
• YTD: 10.07%
• 6M: 9.45%
• 1Y: 23.68%
• 3Y*: 16.98%
• 5Y*: 9.01%
• 10Y*: 9.59%

RFBSX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 0.67%
• 6M: 0.88%
• 1Y: 3.54%
• 3Y*: 4.93%
• 5Y*: 2.04%
• 10Y*: 2.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RELVX vs. RFBSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RELVX Russell Investments LifePoints Equity Growth Strategy Fund	10.07%	18.70%	12.82%	18.70%	-17.25%	20.58%	4.04%	18.42%	-9.80%	15.56%
RFBSX Russell Investments Short Duration Bond Fund	0.67%	5.92%	4.67%	5.06%	-4.95%	-0.75%	4.98%	4.69%	1.27%	1.33%

Correlation

The correlation between RELVX and RFBSX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1999	-0.03

The correlation between RELVX and RFBSX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RELVX vs. RFBSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RELVX

RELVX Risk / Return Rank: 64
RELVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
RELVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
RELVX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
RELVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
RELVX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

RFBSX

RFBSX Risk / Return Rank: 85
RFBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
RFBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
RFBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
RFBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
RFBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RELVX vs. RFBSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments LifePoints Equity Growth Strategy Fund (RELVX) and Russell Investments Short Duration Bond Fund (RFBSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RELVX	RFBSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	2.57	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	4.01	-0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.53	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	3.52	-0.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.36	14.80	-2.43

RELVX vs. RFBSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RELVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the RFBSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RELVX and RFBSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RELVX vs. RFBSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RELVX drawdown since its inception was -66.26%, which is greater than RFBSX's maximum drawdown of -9.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RELVX and RFBSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RELVX	RFBSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.26%	-9.71%	-56.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.77%	-1.04%	-7.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.29%	-1.04%	-14.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.53%	-7.80%	-17.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.08%	-7.80%	-26.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.68%	-0.27%	-0.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.26%	-2.21%	-15.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	0.25%	+1.75%

Volatility

RELVX vs. RFBSX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments LifePoints Equity Growth Strategy Fund (RELVX) has a higher volatility of 4.19% compared to Russell Investments Short Duration Bond Fund (RFBSX) at 0.55%. This indicates that RELVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFBSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RELVX	RFBSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.19%	0.55%	+3.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.17%	1.10%	+8.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.29%	1.43%	+9.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.73%	2.07%	+12.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.21%	1.75%	+13.46%

RELVX vs. RFBSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RELVX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than RFBSX's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

RELVX vs. RFBSX - Dividend Comparison

RELVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.74%, more than RFBSX's 4.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RELVX Russell Investments LifePoints Equity Growth Strategy Fund	9.74%	10.67%	0.80%	1.15%	5.74%	8.12%	1.67%	3.09%	5.24%	2.47%	1.82%	1.15%
RFBSX Russell Investments Short Duration Bond Fund	4.70%	4.85%	3.91%	2.83%	0.68%	1.72%	2.23%	2.43%	2.32%	1.33%	1.73%	1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RELVX and RFBSX in my portfolio?

RELVX and RFBSX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RELVX or RFBSX?

RELVX has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to RFBSX (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RELVX dropped -66.26% vs RFBSX's -9.71%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RFBSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.