PortfoliosLab logo
RFBSX vs. LMBS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RFBSX and LMBS is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

RFBSX vs. LMBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Short Duration Bond Fund (RFBSX) and First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF (LMBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RFBSX:

3.46

LMBS:

2.28

Sortino Ratio

RFBSX:

5.37

LMBS:

3.23

Omega Ratio

RFBSX:

1.77

LMBS:

1.50

Calmar Ratio

RFBSX:

6.28

LMBS:

3.81

Martin Ratio

RFBSX:

16.47

LMBS:

11.44

Ulcer Index

RFBSX:

0.38%

LMBS:

0.57%

Daily Std Dev

RFBSX:

1.83%

LMBS:

2.82%

Max Drawdown

RFBSX:

-9.07%

LMBS:

-6.49%

Current Drawdown

RFBSX:

0.00%

LMBS:

-0.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFBSX achieves a 2.52% return, which is significantly higher than LMBS's 2.24% return. Over the past 10 years, RFBSX has underperformed LMBS with an annualized return of 2.06%, while LMBS has yielded a comparatively higher 2.61% annualized return.


RFBSX

YTD

2.52%

1M

0.26%

6M

2.64%

1Y

6.11%

3Y*

3.74%

5Y*

1.67%

10Y*

2.06%

LMBS

YTD

2.24%

1M

0.00%

6M

1.96%

1Y

6.29%

3Y*

4.13%

5Y*

2.03%

10Y*

2.61%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RFBSX vs. LMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFBSX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than LMBS's 0.68% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RFBSX vs. LMBS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFBSX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RFBSX is 9797
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RFBSX is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RFBSX is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RFBSX is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RFBSX is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RFBSX is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

LMBS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LMBS is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LMBS is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LMBS is 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LMBS is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LMBS is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LMBS is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RFBSX vs. LMBS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Short Duration Bond Fund (RFBSX) and First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF (LMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RFBSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.46, which is higher than the LMBS Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFBSX and LMBS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

RFBSX vs. LMBS - Dividend Comparison

RFBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, which matches LMBS's 4.17% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RFBSX
Russell Investments Short Duration Bond Fund
4.15%3.92%2.82%0.69%1.71%2.23%2.43%2.33%1.34%1.73%1.48%1.92%
LMBS
First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF
4.17%4.28%3.96%2.22%2.04%2.27%2.55%2.76%2.73%2.84%3.03%0.37%

Drawdowns

RFBSX vs. LMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFBSX drawdown since its inception was -9.07%, which is greater than LMBS's maximum drawdown of -6.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFBSX and LMBS.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

RFBSX vs. LMBS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investments Short Duration Bond Fund (RFBSX) is 0.50%, while First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF (LMBS) has a volatility of 0.72%. This indicates that RFBSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...