REIT vs. SRS
REIT (ALPS Active REIT ETF) and SRS (ProShares UltraShort Real Estate) are both REIT funds. REIT is actively managed, while SRS is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, REIT returned 4.86%/yr vs -5.85%/yr for SRS. Their -0.93 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. REIT charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SRS.
Performance
REIT vs. SRS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REIT achieves a 20.12% return, which is significantly higher than SRS's -21.34% return.
REIT
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- 6M
- 18.13%
- YTD
- 20.12%
- 1Y
- 23.92%
- 3Y*
- 11.60%
- 5Y*
- 4.86%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.08%
SRS
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -2.10%
- 6M
- -19.18%
- YTD
- -21.34%
- 1Y
- -18.17%
- 3Y*
- -14.70%
- 5Y*
- -5.85%
- 10Y*
- -16.03%
- ALL TIME*
- -28.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $500.56K | $377.29K | $328.09K | |
| $366.45K | $363.36K | $364.08K |
REIT vs. SRS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REIT ALPS Active REIT ETF | 20.12% | -0.55% | 7.11% | 13.74% | -21.23% | 33.02% |
SRS ProShares UltraShort Real Estate | -21.34% | -1.45% | -3.55% | -18.78% | 54.68% | -48.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between REIT and SRS is -0.93, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2021 | -0.93 |
The correlation between REIT and SRS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.94 to -0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REIT vs. SRS — Risk / Return Rank
REIT
SRS
REIT vs. SRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT) and ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REIT | SRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 0.91 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | -0.71 | +3.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.22 | -1.46 | +11.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REIT vs. SRS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REIT drawdown since its inception was -29.30%, smaller than the maximum SRS drawdown of -99.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REIT and SRS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REIT | SRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.30% | -99.96% | +70.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.35% | -25.73% | +18.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.19% | -54.73% | +36.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.30% | -54.73% | +25.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.40% | -99.96% | +97.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.09% | -91.28% | +81.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 12.47% | -10.12% |
Volatility
REIT vs. SRS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT) is 4.46%, while ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) has a volatility of 8.59%. This indicates that REIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REIT | SRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.46% | 8.59% | -4.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.45% | 22.18% | -11.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.34% | 28.32% | -14.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.51% | 37.81% | -19.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.32% | 40.81% | -22.49% |
REIT vs. SRS - Expense Ratio Comparison
REIT has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than SRS's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
REIT vs. SRS - Dividend Comparison
REIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than SRS's 3.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REIT ALPS Active REIT ETF | 2.65% | 3.20% | 3.06% | 3.13% | 2.81% | 4.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRS ProShares UltraShort Real Estate | 3.67% | 3.61% | 6.06% | 4.49% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 1.80% | 0.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REIT and SRS have a correlation of -0.93, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRS has higher volatility (8.59%) compared to REIT (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REIT dropped -29.30% vs SRS's -99.96%.
On 5-year performance, REIT leads with 4.86% vs -5.85% for SRS. On fees, REIT is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, REIT has been the lower-risk option at 4.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, REIT has performed better with a 4.86% return vs -5.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
REIT is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SRS.
SRS has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 2.65% for REIT.
They also come from different issuers: ALPS and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for REIT and 0.95% for SRS.
REIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REIT and SRS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer