REIT vs. CMCX.L

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

REIT (ALPS Active REIT ETF) is REIT fund actively managed by ALPS, while CMCX.L (CMC Markets plc) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, REIT returned 4.64%/yr vs 2.61%/yr for CMCX.L. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

REIT vs. CMCX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT) and CMC Markets plc (CMCX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

REIT is traded in USD, while CMCX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMCX.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REIT achieves a 17.44% return, which is significantly lower than CMCX.L's 54.48% return.

REIT

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: 4.83%
• YTD: 17.44%
• 6M: 17.70%
• 1Y: 18.15%
• 3Y*: 11.38%
• 5Y*: 4.64%
• 10Y*: —

CMCX.L

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 23.12%
• YTD: 54.48%
• 6M: 63.17%
• 1Y: 90.70%
• 3Y*: 49.85%
• 5Y*: 2.61%
• 10Y*: 9.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REIT vs. CMCX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
REIT ALPS Active REIT ETF	17.44%	-0.55%	7.11%	13.74%	-21.23%	33.02%
CMCX.L CMC Markets plc	54.48%	36.76%	140.02%	-48.87%	-20.49%	-35.00%

Correlation

The correlation between REIT and CMCX.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2021	0.19

Return for Risk

REIT vs. CMCX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REIT

REIT Risk / Return Rank: 44
REIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
REIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
REIT Omega Ratio Rank: 40
REIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
REIT Martin Ratio Rank: 46

CMCX.L

CMCX.L Risk / Return Rank: 93
CMCX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
CMCX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CMCX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CMCX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
CMCX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REIT vs. CMCX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT) and CMC Markets plc (CMCX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	REIT	CMCX.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	1.95	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.80	3.96	-2.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.46	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.35	4.19	-1.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.81	10.78	-3.97

REIT vs. CMCX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REIT Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the CMCX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REIT and CMCX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

REIT vs. CMCX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REIT drawdown since its inception was -29.30%, smaller than the maximum CMCX.L drawdown of -82.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REIT and CMCX.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	REIT	CMCX.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.30%	-82.48%	+53.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.35%	-20.24%	+12.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.19%	-45.82%	+27.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.30%	-80.36%	+51.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-82.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.05%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.32%	-43.80%	+33.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.53%	7.88%	-5.35%

Volatility

REIT vs. CMCX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT) is 4.60%, while CMC Markets plc (CMCX.L) has a volatility of 17.57%. This indicates that REIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMCX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	REIT	CMCX.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.60%	17.57%	-12.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.43%	25.50%	-16.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.07%	43.41%	-30.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.48%	48.29%	-29.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.37%	47.85%	-29.48%

Dividends

REIT vs. CMCX.L - Dividend Comparison

REIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than CMCX.L's 2.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CMCX.L CMC Markets plc	2.97%	4.62%	4.19%	4.67%	5.53%	9.46%	5.47%	2.41%	6.94%	5.95%
REIT ALPS Active REIT ETF	2.69%	3.20%	3.06%	3.13%	2.81%	4.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both REIT and CMCX.L in my portfolio?

REIT and CMCX.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.