REIT vs. AIGA.L
REIT (ALPS Active REIT ETF) and AIGA.L (WisdomTree Agriculture) are both exchange-traded funds - REIT is a REIT fund actively managed by ALPS, while AIGA.L is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Agriculture. REIT is actively managed, while AIGA.L is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, REIT returned 4.64%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for AIGA.L. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. REIT charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for AIGA.L.
Performance
REIT vs. AIGA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REIT achieves a 17.44% return, which is significantly higher than AIGA.L's 2.21% return.
REIT
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 4.83%
- YTD
- 17.44%
- 6M
- 17.70%
- 1Y
- 18.15%
- 3Y*
- 11.38%
- 5Y*
- 4.64%
- 10Y*
- —
AIGA.L
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -5.79%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- -0.00%
- 1Y
- -1.31%
- 3Y*
- -3.46%
- 5Y*
- 0.70%
- 10Y*
- 0.03%
REIT vs. AIGA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REIT ALPS Active REIT ETF | 17.44% | -0.55% | 7.11% | 13.74% | -21.23% | 33.02% |
AIGA.L WisdomTree Agriculture | 2.21% | -2.00% | -6.82% | -4.27% | 13.91% | 13.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between REIT and AIGA.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2021 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REIT vs. AIGA.L — Risk / Return Rank
REIT
AIGA.L
REIT vs. AIGA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT) and WisdomTree Agriculture (AIGA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REIT | AIGA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.01 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 0.02 | +2.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.81 | 0.04 | +6.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REIT vs. AIGA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REIT drawdown since its inception was -29.30%, smaller than the maximum AIGA.L drawdown of -67.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REIT and AIGA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REIT | AIGA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.30% | -67.98% | +38.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.35% | -10.42% | +3.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.19% | -23.75% | +5.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.30% | -28.61% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -43.26% | +43.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.32% | -41.31% | +30.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 4.52% | -1.99% |
Volatility
REIT vs. AIGA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT) is 4.60%, while WisdomTree Agriculture (AIGA.L) has a volatility of 5.27%. This indicates that REIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIGA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REIT | AIGA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 5.27% | -0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.43% | 10.23% | -0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.07% | 13.53% | -0.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.48% | 16.74% | +1.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.37% | 28.29% | -9.92% |
REIT vs. AIGA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
REIT has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than AIGA.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
REIT vs. AIGA.L - Dividend Comparison
REIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, while AIGA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIGA.L WisdomTree Agriculture | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REIT ALPS Active REIT ETF | 2.69% | 3.20% | 3.06% | 3.13% | 2.81% | 4.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REIT and AIGA.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIGA.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIGA.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for REIT.
REIT is categorized as REIT, while AIGA.L is Agricultural Commodities. They also come from different issuers: ALPS and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for REIT and 0.49% for AIGA.L.
Find the right allocation for REIT and AIGA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer