REGS vs. SPIT
REGS (Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF) and SPIT (F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. REGS charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SPIT.
Performance
REGS vs. SPIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
REGS
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -4.44%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPIT
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- 4.58%
- 6M
- 28.38%
- YTD
- 31.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REGS vs. SPIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
REGS Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF | 9.85% |
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF | 28.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between REGS and SPIT is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REGS vs. SPIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF (REGS) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REGS vs. SPIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REGS drawdown since its inception was -7.59%, smaller than the maximum SPIT drawdown of -12.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGS and SPIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REGS | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.59% | -12.49% | +4.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.84% | -2.65% | -3.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.22% | -2.49% | +0.27% |
Volatility
REGS vs. SPIT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REGS | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.25% | 26.42% | -6.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.25% | 26.42% | -6.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.25% | 26.42% | -6.17% |
REGS vs. SPIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
REGS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SPIT's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
REGS vs. SPIT - Dividend Comparison
REGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
REGS Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF | 5.48% | 7.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REGS and SPIT have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, REGS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
REGS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SPIT.
SPIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.48%, compared with 0.00% for REGS.
They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for REGS and 0.89% for SPIT.
Find the right allocation for REGS and SPIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer