REGB.L vs. SVR-C.TO
REGB.L (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A) and SVR-C.TO (iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged)) are both exchange-traded funds - REGB.L is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD, while SVR-C.TO is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, REGB.L returned 0.07%/yr vs 34.76%/yr for SVR-C.TO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. REGB.L charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for SVR-C.TO.
Performance
REGB.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
REGB.L is traded in GBP, while SVR-C.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the SVR-C.TO values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REGB.L achieves a 16.69% return, which is significantly higher than SVR-C.TO's -16.00% return.
REGB.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -15.09%
- YTD
- 16.69%
- 6M
- 15.50%
- 1Y
- 118.12%
- 3Y*
- 0.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SVR-C.TO
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- -20.54%
- YTD
- -16.00%
- 6M
- -21.44%
- 1Y
- 69.87%
- 3Y*
- 34.76%
- 5Y*
- 18.05%
- 10Y*
- 11.53%
REGB.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REGB.L VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A | 16.69% | 75.67% | -34.55% | -22.78% | -22.89% | -20.32% |
SVR-C.TO iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) | -16.00% | 126.67% | 22.52% | -5.26% | 15.42% | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between REGB.L and SVR-C.TO is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021 | 0.21 |
Over the past year, REGB.L and SVR-C.TO have become more correlated (0.45) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REGB.L vs. SVR-C.TO — Risk / Return Rank
REGB.L
SVR-C.TO
REGB.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) and iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REGB.L | SVR-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.25 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.67 | 1.44 | +4.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.51 | 3.19 | +10.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REGB.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REGB.L drawdown since its inception was -74.24%, which is greater than SVR-C.TO's maximum drawdown of -60.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGB.L and SVR-C.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REGB.L | SVR-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.24% | -60.18% | -14.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.93% | -48.72% | +27.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.57% | -48.72% | -11.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -48.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.34% | -47.15% | +10.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.84% | -32.00% | -12.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.78% | 21.98% | -13.20% |
Volatility
REGB.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) is 13.32%, while iShares Silver Bullion ETF (Non-Hedged) (SVR-C.TO) has a volatility of 14.65%. This indicates that REGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SVR-C.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REGB.L | SVR-C.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.32% | 14.65% | -1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.12% | 54.74% | -21.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.36% | 57.51% | -11.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.34% | 35.57% | +10.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.34% | 31.86% | +14.48% |
REGB.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
REGB.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than SVR-C.TO's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
REGB.L vs. SVR-C.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither REGB.L nor SVR-C.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
REGB.L and SVR-C.TO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, REGB.L is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
REGB.L is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for SVR-C.TO.
REGB.L is categorized as Rare Earth & Strategic Metals, while SVR-C.TO is Silver. REGB.L tracks EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD, while SVR-C.TO tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for REGB.L and 0.66% for SVR-C.TO.
Find the right allocation for REGB.L and SVR-C.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer