REGB.L vs. SLVP
REGB.L (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A) and SLVP (iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REGB.L is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD, while SLVP is a Silver fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, REGB.L returned 0.07%/yr vs 47.08%/yr for SLVP. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. REGB.L charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for SLVP.
Performance
REGB.L vs. SLVP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
REGB.L is traded in GBP, while SLVP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SLVP values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REGB.L achieves a 16.69% return, which is significantly higher than SLVP's -8.07% return.
REGB.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -15.09%
- YTD
- 16.69%
- 6M
- 15.50%
- 1Y
- 118.12%
- 3Y*
- 0.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLVP
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -15.08%
- YTD
- -8.07%
- 6M
- -9.68%
- 1Y
- 83.36%
- 3Y*
- 47.08%
- 5Y*
- 17.12%
- 10Y*
- 9.89%
REGB.L vs. SLVP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REGB.L VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A | 16.69% | 75.67% | -34.55% | -22.78% | -22.89% | -20.32% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | -8.07% | 181.27% | 16.47% | -7.19% | -8.31% | 3.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between REGB.L and SLVP is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021 | 0.32 |
The correlation between REGB.L and SLVP shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REGB.L vs. SLVP — Risk / Return Rank
REGB.L
SLVP
REGB.L vs. SLVP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) and iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REGB.L | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.26 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.67 | 2.23 | +3.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.51 | 5.45 | +8.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REGB.L vs. SLVP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REGB.L drawdown since its inception was -74.24%, roughly equal to the maximum SLVP drawdown of -78.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGB.L and SLVP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REGB.L | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.24% | -78.11% | +3.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.93% | -37.55% | +16.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.57% | -37.55% | -23.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.34% | -33.64% | -2.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.84% | -39.08% | -5.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.78% | 15.34% | -6.56% |
Volatility
REGB.L vs. SLVP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) is 13.32%, while iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) has a volatility of 18.44%. This indicates that REGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLVP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REGB.L | SLVP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.32% | 18.44% | -5.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.12% | 43.71% | -10.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.36% | 53.36% | -7.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.34% | 40.32% | +6.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.34% | 40.33% | +6.01% |
REGB.L vs. SLVP - Expense Ratio Comparison
REGB.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SLVP's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
REGB.L vs. SLVP - Dividend Comparison
REGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLVP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REGB.L VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLVP iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF | 2.28% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 0.88% | 0.63% | 1.63% | 2.39% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 0.85% | 2.32% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REGB.L and SLVP have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SLVP is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SLVP is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REGB.L.
REGB.L is categorized as Rare Earth & Strategic Metals, while SLVP is Silver. REGB.L tracks EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD, while SLVP tracks MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for REGB.L and 0.39% for SLVP.
Find the right allocation for REGB.L and SLVP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer