REGB.L vs. SIVR
REGB.L (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A) and SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REGB.L is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD, while SIVR is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, REGB.L returned 0.07%/yr vs 35.13%/yr for SIVR. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. REGB.L charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SIVR.
Performance
REGB.L vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
REGB.L is traded in GBP, while SIVR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SIVR values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REGB.L achieves a 16.69% return, which is significantly higher than SIVR's -15.42% return.
REGB.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -15.09%
- YTD
- 16.69%
- 6M
- 15.50%
- 1Y
- 118.12%
- 3Y*
- 0.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIVR
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- -20.42%
- YTD
- -15.42%
- 6M
- -21.01%
- 1Y
- 69.40%
- 3Y*
- 35.13%
- 5Y*
- 18.41%
- 10Y*
- 11.31%
REGB.L vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REGB.L VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A | 16.69% | 75.67% | -34.55% | -22.78% | -22.89% | -20.32% |
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | -15.42% | 127.86% | 23.20% | -5.87% | 14.79% | 4.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between REGB.L and SIVR is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021 | 0.28 |
The correlation between REGB.L and SIVR shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REGB.L vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank
REGB.L
SIVR
REGB.L vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REGB.L | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.25 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.67 | 1.44 | +4.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.51 | 3.19 | +10.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REGB.L vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REGB.L drawdown since its inception was -74.24%, which is greater than SIVR's maximum drawdown of -69.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGB.L and SIVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REGB.L | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.24% | -69.37% | -4.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.93% | -48.54% | +27.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.57% | -48.54% | -12.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -48.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.34% | -47.13% | +10.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.84% | -39.99% | -4.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.78% | 21.80% | -13.02% |
Volatility
REGB.L vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) is 13.32%, while abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a volatility of 14.80%. This indicates that REGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REGB.L | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.32% | 14.80% | -1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.12% | 56.69% | -23.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.36% | 58.79% | -12.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.34% | 34.54% | +11.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.34% | 30.48% | +15.86% |
REGB.L vs. SIVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
REGB.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SIVR's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
REGB.L vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison
Neither REGB.L nor SIVR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
REGB.L and SIVR have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SIVR is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SIVR is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REGB.L.
REGB.L is categorized as Rare Earth & Strategic Metals, while SIVR is Silver. REGB.L tracks EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD, while SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for REGB.L and 0.30% for SIVR.
Find the right allocation for REGB.L and SIVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer