PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REFI vs. BXMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

REFI vs. BXMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI) and Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REFI achieves a -2.68% return, which is significantly higher than BXMT's -3.07% return.


REFI

1D
3.06%
1M
0.53%
YTD
-2.68%
6M
-4.63%
1Y
-6.81%
3Y*
3.02%
5Y*
10Y*

BXMT

1D
1.46%
1M
0.72%
YTD
-3.07%
6M
-5.60%
1Y
3.30%
3Y*
7.73%
5Y*
-0.89%
10Y*
5.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REFI vs. BXMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
REFI
Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
-2.68%-8.70%8.69%23.70%3.35%1.52%
BXMT
Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.
-3.07%21.13%-7.90%13.46%-24.03%0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between REFI and BXMT is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021

0.44

The correlation between REFI and BXMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.57 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

REFI:

$245.99M

BXMT:

$3.06B

EPS

REFI:

$226.63

BXMT:

$0.61

PE Ratio

REFI:

0.05

BXMT:

29.84

PEG Ratio

REFI:

0.00

BXMT:

1.47

PS Ratio

REFI:

5.54

BXMT:

2.01

PB Ratio

REFI:

0.00

BXMT:

0.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

REFI:

$44.35M

BXMT:

$1.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

REFI:

$42.41M

BXMT:

$960.53M

EBITDA (TTM)

REFI:

$8.16M

BXMT:

$957.49M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REFI vs. BXMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REFI
REFI Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
REFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
REFI Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
REFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
REFI Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

BXMT
BXMT Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
BXMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BXMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
BXMT Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
BXMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
BXMT Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REFI vs. BXMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI) and Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REFIBXMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.04

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.46

0.28

-0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.82

0.60

-1.43

REFI vs. BXMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REFI Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the BXMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REFI and BXMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REFI vs. BXMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REFI drawdown since its inception was -26.55%, smaller than the maximum BXMT drawdown of -97.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REFI and BXMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REFIBXMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.55%

-97.98%

+71.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.71%

-12.02%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.25%

-23.29%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.63%

-34.94%

+19.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.93%

-49.05%

+39.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.28%

5.48%

+2.80%

Volatility

REFI vs. BXMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. (REFI) is 6.25%, while Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT) has a volatility of 7.13%. This indicates that REFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BXMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REFIBXMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.25%

7.13%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.18%

16.79%

-0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.78%

21.91%

+1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.32%

27.75%

-3.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.32%

32.64%

-8.32%

Dividends

REFI vs. BXMT - Dividend Comparison

REFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.42%, more than BXMT's 10.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BXMT
Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.
10.39%9.83%12.52%11.66%11.71%8.10%9.01%6.66%7.78%7.71%8.25%8.52%
REFI
Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc.
16.42%15.33%13.36%13.41%13.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

REFI vs. BXMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc. and Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
380.15M
(REFI) Total Revenue
(BXMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


REFI and BXMT have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BXMT has higher volatility (7.13%) compared to REFI (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REFI dropped -26.55% vs BXMT's -97.98%.

BXMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REFI and BXMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer