PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REFA vs. BUFI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REFA vs. BUFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Research Enhanced International Equity ETF (REFA) and AB International Buffer ETF (BUFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REFA achieves a 11.14% return, which is significantly higher than BUFI's 6.13% return.


REFA

1D
1.35%
1M
2.81%
6M
9.75%
YTD
11.14%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUFI

1D
0.79%
1M
1.15%
6M
5.42%
YTD
6.13%
1Y
12.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REFA vs. BUFI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between REFA and BUFI is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025

0.95

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REFA vs. BUFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REFA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BUFI
BUFI Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
BUFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFI Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFI Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REFA vs. BUFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced International Equity ETF (REFA) and AB International Buffer ETF (BUFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REFABUFIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.85

REFA vs. BUFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REFA vs. BUFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REFA drawdown since its inception was -11.23%, which is greater than BUFI's maximum drawdown of -7.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REFA and BUFI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REFABUFIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.23%

-7.43%

-3.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

0.00%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.79%

-0.83%

-1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.43%

Volatility

REFA vs. BUFI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REFABUFIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.61%

8.66%

+9.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.61%

9.14%

+9.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.61%

9.14%

+9.47%

REFA vs. BUFI - Expense Ratio Comparison

REFA has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFI's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

REFA vs. BUFI - Dividend Comparison

REFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while BUFI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, REFA and BUFI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, REFA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

REFA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for BUFI.

REFA has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.00% for BUFI.

REFA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BUFI is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for REFA and 0.69% for BUFI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REFA and BUFI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer