PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REET vs. MUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REET vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REET achieves a 13.29% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 640.02% return.


REET

1D
0.07%
1M
0.78%
6M
11.33%
YTD
13.29%
1Y
16.22%
3Y*
9.19%
5Y*
2.74%
10Y*
3.96%

MUU

1D
9.50%
1M
-10.60%
6M
441.55%
YTD
640.02%
1Y
3,397.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REET vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
REET
iShares Global REIT ETF
13.29%7.97%-5.86%
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
640.02%599.03%-40.91%

Correlation

The correlation between REET and MUU is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REET vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REET
REET Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
REET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REET Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
REET Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
REET Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
REET Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

MUU
MUU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REET vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REETMUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-28.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.73

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

81.19

-79.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.49

269.76

-263.27

REET vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REET Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 29.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REET and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REET vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REET drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REET and MUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REETMUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.59%

-75.07%

+30.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.04%

-52.72%

+43.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-30.27%

+29.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.70%

-23.44%

+13.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

16.68%

-14.17%

Volatility

REET vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) is 4.06%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 67.96%. This indicates that REET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REETMUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

67.96%

-63.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.76%

115.39%

-105.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.56%

145.68%

-133.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.97%

138.08%

-121.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.83%

138.08%

-119.25%

REET vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

REET has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

REET vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

REET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, more than MUU's 0.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
0.64%4.27%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
REET
iShares Global REIT ETF
3.32%3.67%3.64%3.27%2.43%3.18%2.65%5.25%5.73%3.84%5.37%3.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


REET and MUU have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUU has higher volatility (67.96%) compared to REET (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REET dropped -44.59% vs MUU's -75.07%.

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 3397.63% vs 16.22% for REET. On fees, REET is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, REET has been the lower-risk option at 4.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 3397.63% return vs 16.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

REET is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.

REET has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 0.64% for MUU.

REET is categorized as REIT, while MUU is Leveraged Equities. REET tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index, while MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for REET and 1.01% for MUU.

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (29.47 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REET and MUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer