REET vs. IFGL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

REET (iShares Global REIT ETF) and IFGL (iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds from iShares - REET tracks the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index while IFGL tracks the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Real Estate ex-U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, REET returned 3.99%/yr vs 1.41%/yr for IFGL. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. REET charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for IFGL.

Performance

REET vs. IFGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REET achieves a 8.07% return, which is significantly higher than IFGL's -2.19% return. Over the past 10 years, REET has outperformed IFGL with an annualized return of 3.99%, while IFGL has yielded a comparatively lower 1.41% annualized return.

REET

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -0.74%
• YTD: 8.07%
• 6M: 7.69%
• 1Y: 12.24%
• 3Y*: 9.19%
• 5Y*: 2.22%
• 10Y*: 3.99%

IFGL

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: -4.06%
• YTD: -2.19%
• 6M: -0.58%
• 1Y: 6.13%
• 3Y*: 6.59%
• 5Y*: -2.66%
• 10Y*: 1.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REET vs. IFGL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
REET iShares Global REIT ETF	8.07%	7.97%	2.65%	10.28%	-24.10%	32.43%	-10.48%	24.42%	-5.27%	7.48%
IFGL iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF	-2.19%	24.31%	-7.25%	5.40%	-24.21%	8.29%	-7.62%	20.65%	-6.39%	20.00%

Correlation

The correlation between REET and IFGL is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2014	0.71

The correlation between REET and IFGL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

REET vs. IFGL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	REET	IFGL
Real Estate	99.8%	98.9%
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Technology	-	1.1%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

REET vs. IFGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REET

REET Risk / Return Rank: 28
REET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
REET Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
REET Omega Ratio Rank: 27
REET Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
REET Martin Ratio Rank: 32

IFGL

IFGL Risk / Return Rank: 15
IFGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
IFGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
IFGL Omega Ratio Rank: 15
IFGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
IFGL Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REET vs. IFGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	REET	IFGL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.02	0.45	+0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	0.74	+0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.09	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.36	0.43	+0.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.89	1.32	+3.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

REET vs. IFGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REET Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the IFGL Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REET and IFGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	REET	IFGL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.02	0.45	+0.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13	-0.16	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21	0.09	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.04	+0.21

Drawdowns

REET vs. IFGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REET drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, smaller than the maximum IFGL drawdown of -67.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REET and IFGL.

Drawdown Indicators

	REET	IFGL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.59%	-67.94%	+23.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.04%	-14.38%	+5.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.02%	-18.77%	+0.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.11%	-38.47%	+6.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.59%	-40.38%	-4.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.83%	-14.94%	+12.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.79%	-16.68%	+6.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.51%	4.65%	-2.14%

Volatility

REET vs. IFGL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) is 3.79%, while iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that REET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IFGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	REET	IFGL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.79%	4.54%	-0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.81%	11.46%	-2.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.10%	13.68%	-1.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.95%	16.38%	+0.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.84%	16.59%	+2.25%

REET vs. IFGL - Expense Ratio Comparison

REET has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than IFGL's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

REET vs. IFGL - Dividend Comparison

REET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than IFGL's 3.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IFGL iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF	3.90%	3.71%	4.83%	1.82%	2.79%	3.25%	2.17%	7.60%	4.10%	4.90%	7.68%	3.70%
REET iShares Global REIT ETF	3.42%	3.67%	3.64%	3.27%	2.43%	3.18%	2.65%	5.25%	5.73%	3.84%	5.37%	3.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both REET and IFGL in my portfolio?

REET and IFGL have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, REET or IFGL?

IFGL has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to REET (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REET dropped -44.59% vs IFGL's -67.94%.

Which ETF is better, REET or IFGL?

On 10-year performance, REET leads with 3.99% vs 1.41% for IFGL. On fees, REET is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, REET has been the lower-risk option at 3.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, REET or IFGL?

Over the 10-year period, REET has performed better with a 3.99% return vs 1.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, REET or IFGL?

REET is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for IFGL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, REET or IFGL?

IFGL has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 3.42% for REET.

What is the main difference between REET and IFGL?

REET tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index, while IFGL tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Real Estate ex-U.S. Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for REET and 0.48% for IFGL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

REET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.