REET vs. IFGL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL).

REET and IFGL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. REET is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index. It was launched on Jul 8, 2014. IFGL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Real Estate ex-U.S. Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2007. Both REET and IFGL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

REET vs. IFGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

REET vs. IFGL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
REET iShares Global REIT ETF	1.30%	7.97%	2.65%	10.28%	-24.10%	32.43%	-10.48%	24.42%	-5.27%	7.48%
IFGL iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF	-2.67%	24.31%	-7.25%	5.40%	-24.21%	8.29%	-7.62%	20.65%	-6.39%	20.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REET achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly higher than IFGL's -2.67% return. Over the past 10 years, REET has outperformed IFGL with an annualized return of 3.46%, while IFGL has yielded a comparatively lower 1.66% annualized return.

REET

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: -7.25%
• YTD: 1.30%
• 6M: 0.39%
• 1Y: 7.51%
• 3Y*: 6.78%
• 5Y*: 2.64%
• 10Y*: 3.46%

IFGL

• 1D: 2.48%
• 1M: -12.00%
• YTD: -2.67%
• 6M: -1.05%
• 1Y: 17.76%
• 3Y*: 6.31%
• 5Y*: -1.19%
• 10Y*: 1.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REET vs. IFGL - Expense Ratio Comparison

REET has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than IFGL's 0.48% expense ratio.

IFGL

iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF

REET

iShares Global REIT ETF

Return for Risk

REET vs. IFGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REET

REET Risk / Return Rank: 30
REET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
REET Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
REET Omega Ratio Rank: 28
REET Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
REET Martin Ratio Rank: 35

IFGL

IFGL Risk / Return Rank: 61
IFGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
IFGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
IFGL Omega Ratio Rank: 65
IFGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
IFGL Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REET vs. IFGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	REET	IFGL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.50	1.24	-0.74
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.78	1.76	-0.98
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.24	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.69	1.17	-0.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.90	5.14	-2.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

REET vs. IFGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REET Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the IFGL Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REET and IFGL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	REET	IFGL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50	1.24	-0.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	-0.07	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18	0.10	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.04	+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between REET and IFGL is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

REET vs. IFGL - Dividend Comparison

REET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, less than IFGL's 3.92% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
REET iShares Global REIT ETF	3.65%	3.67%	3.64%	3.27%	2.43%	3.18%	2.65%	5.25%	5.73%	3.84%	5.37%	3.56%
IFGL iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF	3.92%	3.71%	4.83%	1.82%	2.79%	3.25%	2.17%	7.60%	4.10%	4.90%	7.68%	3.70%

Drawdowns

REET vs. IFGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REET drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, smaller than the maximum IFGL drawdown of -67.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REET and IFGL.

Drawdown Indicators

	REET	IFGL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.59%	-67.94%	+23.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.70%	-14.38%	+2.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.11%	-38.47%	+6.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.59%	-40.38%	-4.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.39%	-15.36%	+7.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.91%	-16.73%	+6.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.79%	3.28%	-0.49%

Volatility

REET vs. IFGL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) is 4.66%, while iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) has a volatility of 6.49%. This indicates that REET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IFGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	REET	IFGL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.66%	6.49%	-1.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.28%	9.61%	-1.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.07%	14.41%	+0.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.92%	16.16%	+0.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.83%	16.49%	+2.34%