REET vs. IBIT
REET (iShares Global REIT ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REET is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, REET returned 12.24% vs -38.74% for IBIT. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. REET charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
REET vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REET achieves a 8.07% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -25.48% return.
REET
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- YTD
- 8.07%
- 6M
- 7.69%
- 1Y
- 12.24%
- 3Y*
- 9.19%
- 5Y*
- 2.22%
- 10Y*
- 3.99%
IBIT
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- -18.50%
- YTD
- -25.48%
- 6M
- -29.84%
- 1Y
- -38.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REET vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 8.07% | 7.97% | 3.89% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -25.48% | -6.41% | 99.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between REET and IBIT is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REET vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
REET
IBIT
REET vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REET | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.86 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | -0.79 | +2.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.89 | -1.36 | +6.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REET | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | -0.89 | +1.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.30 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
REET vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REET drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REET and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REET | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.59% | -49.36% | +4.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.04% | -49.36% | +40.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.83% | -48.10% | +45.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.79% | -16.02% | +6.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 28.44% | -25.93% |
Volatility
REET vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) is 3.79%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that REET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REET | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | 9.50% | -5.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.81% | 34.44% | -25.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.10% | 43.73% | -31.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 50.19% | -33.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 50.19% | -31.35% |
REET vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
REET has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
REET vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
REET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 3.42% | 3.67% | 3.64% | 3.27% | 2.43% | 3.18% | 2.65% | 5.25% | 5.73% | 3.84% | 5.37% | 3.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REET and IBIT have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to REET (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REET dropped -44.59% vs IBIT's -49.36%.
On 1-year performance, REET leads with 12.24% vs -38.74% for IBIT. On fees, REET is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, REET has been the lower-risk option at 3.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, REET has performed better with a 12.24% return vs -38.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
REET is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.
REET has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
REET is categorized as REIT, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. REET tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for REET and 0.25% for IBIT.
REET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REET and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer