REET vs. IAU
REET (iShares Global REIT ETF) and IAU (iShares Gold Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - REET is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index, while IAU is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, REET returned 3.99%/yr vs 13.31%/yr for IAU. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. REET charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IAU.
Performance
REET vs. IAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REET achieves a 8.07% return, which is significantly higher than IAU's 2.98% return. Over the past 10 years, REET has underperformed IAU with an annualized return of 3.99%, while IAU has yielded a comparatively higher 13.31% annualized return.
REET
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- YTD
- 8.07%
- 6M
- 7.69%
- 1Y
- 12.24%
- 3Y*
- 9.19%
- 5Y*
- 2.22%
- 10Y*
- 3.99%
IAU
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 2.98%
- 6M
- 5.50%
- 1Y
- 32.20%
- 3Y*
- 31.29%
- 5Y*
- 18.32%
- 10Y*
- 13.31%
REET vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 8.07% | 7.97% | 2.65% | 10.28% | -24.10% | 32.43% | -10.48% | 24.42% | -5.27% | 7.48% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 2.98% | 63.95% | 26.85% | 12.84% | -0.63% | -4.00% | 25.03% | 17.98% | -1.76% | 12.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between REET and IAU is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2014 | 0.15 |
The correlation between REET and IAU shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
REET vs. IAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
REET
IAU
Real Estate
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
REET
IAU
Financial Services
REET
IAU
-
Basic Materials
REET
-
IAU
-
Communication Services
REET
-
IAU
-
Consumer Cyclical
REET
-
IAU
-
Consumer Defensive
REET
-
IAU
-
Energy
REET
-
IAU
-
Healthcare
REET
-
IAU
-
Industrials
REET
-
IAU
-
Technology
REET
-
IAU
-
Utilities
REET
-
IAU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REET vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank
REET
IAU
REET vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REET | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.24 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 1.69 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.89 | 4.19 | +0.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REET | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 1.23 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 1.03 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | 0.84 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.62 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
REET vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REET drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, roughly equal to the maximum IAU drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REET and IAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REET | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.59% | -45.14% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.04% | -19.18% | +10.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.02% | -19.18% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.11% | -20.93% | -11.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.59% | -21.82% | -22.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.83% | -17.70% | +14.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.79% | -15.96% | +6.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 7.71% | -5.20% |
Volatility
REET vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) is 3.79%, while iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that REET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REET | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | 5.50% | -1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.81% | 23.02% | -14.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.10% | 26.42% | -14.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 17.95% | -1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 15.90% | +2.94% |
REET vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
REET has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
REET vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison
REET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 3.42% | 3.67% | 3.64% | 3.27% | 2.43% | 3.18% | 2.65% | 5.25% | 5.73% | 3.84% | 5.37% | 3.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REET and IAU have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IAU has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to REET (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REET dropped -44.59% vs IAU's -45.14%.
On 10-year performance, IAU leads with 13.31% vs 3.99% for REET. On fees, REET is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, REET has been the lower-risk option at 3.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IAU has performed better with a 13.31% return vs 3.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
REET is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IAU.
REET has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.
REET is categorized as REIT, while IAU is Gold. REET tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index, while IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for REET and 0.25% for IAU.
IAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REET and IAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer