PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REET vs. BNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REET vs. BNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REET achieves a 12.42% return, which is significantly higher than BNDX's 1.02% return. Over the past 10 years, REET has outperformed BNDX with an annualized return of 4.50%, while BNDX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.72% annualized return.


REET

1D
0.76%
1M
2.38%
YTD
12.42%
6M
13.41%
1Y
15.04%
3Y*
10.34%
5Y*
2.51%
10Y*
4.50%

BNDX

1D
0.17%
1M
0.99%
YTD
1.02%
6M
1.22%
1Y
1.94%
3Y*
4.32%
5Y*
0.32%
10Y*
1.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REET vs. BNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REET
iShares Global REIT ETF
12.42%7.97%2.65%10.28%-24.10%32.43%-10.48%24.42%-5.27%7.48%
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
1.02%2.86%3.57%8.77%-12.76%-2.29%4.65%7.87%2.81%2.40%

Correlation

The correlation between REET and BNDX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2014

0.19

Over the past year, REET and BNDX have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.19, meaning their price movements have been converging.

REET vs. BNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
REET
BNDX

Real Estate

99.8%
0.0%

Financial Services

0.2%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.0%

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Industrials

-

0.0%

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

0.0%

Real Estate

REET
99.8%
BNDX
0.0%

Financial Services

REET
0.2%
BNDX
0.0%

Basic Materials

REET

-

BNDX

-

Communication Services

REET

-

BNDX
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

REET

-

BNDX

-

Consumer Defensive

REET

-

BNDX

-

Energy

REET

-

BNDX
0.0%

Healthcare

REET

-

BNDX
0.0%

Industrials

REET

-

BNDX
0.0%

Technology

REET

-

BNDX

-

Utilities

REET

-

BNDX
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REET vs. BNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REET
REET Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
REET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REET Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
REET Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
REET Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
REET Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDX
BNDX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
BNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REET vs. BNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REETBNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.10

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

0.66

+1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.00

1.84

+4.15

REET vs. BNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REET Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the BNDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REET and BNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REET vs. BNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REET drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, which is greater than BNDX's maximum drawdown of -16.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REET and BNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REETBNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.59%

-16.23%

-28.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.04%

-2.93%

-6.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.02%

-2.93%

-15.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.11%

-15.86%

-16.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.59%

-16.23%

-28.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.02%

+1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.76%

-3.10%

-6.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

1.05%

+1.47%

Volatility

REET vs. BNDX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) at 1.49%. This indicates that REET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REETBNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

1.49%

+2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.07%

2.96%

+6.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.31%

3.47%

+8.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.97%

4.89%

+12.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.85%

4.10%

+14.75%

REET vs. BNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

REET has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDX's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

REET vs. BNDX - Dividend Comparison

REET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than BNDX's 4.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
4.47%4.39%4.18%4.42%1.51%3.74%1.11%3.40%3.01%2.23%1.89%1.63%
REET
iShares Global REIT ETF
3.29%3.67%3.64%3.27%2.43%3.18%2.65%5.25%5.73%3.84%5.37%3.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


REET and BNDX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REET has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to BNDX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REET dropped -44.59% vs BNDX's -16.23%.

On 10-year performance, REET leads with 4.50% vs 1.72% for BNDX. On fees, BNDX is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, BNDX has been the lower-risk option at 1.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, REET has performed better with a 4.50% return vs 1.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BNDX is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for REET.

BNDX has the higher dividend yield at 4.47%, compared with 3.29% for REET.

REET is categorized as REIT, while BNDX is Global Bonds. REET tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index, while BNDX tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (USD Hedged). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for REET and 0.07% for BNDX.

REET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REET and BNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer