REET vs. ACWI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

REET (iShares Global REIT ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REET is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, REET returned 3.99%/yr vs 12.85%/yr for ACWI. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. REET charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.

Performance

REET vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REET achieves a 8.07% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 12.13% return. Over the past 10 years, REET has underperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 3.99%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.85% annualized return.

REET

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -0.74%
• YTD: 8.07%
• 6M: 7.69%
• 1Y: 12.24%
• 3Y*: 9.19%
• 5Y*: 2.22%
• 10Y*: 3.99%

ACWI

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 5.28%
• YTD: 12.13%
• 6M: 12.96%
• 1Y: 29.18%
• 3Y*: 21.15%
• 5Y*: 11.28%
• 10Y*: 12.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REET vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
REET iShares Global REIT ETF	8.07%	7.97%	2.65%	10.28%	-24.10%	32.43%	-10.48%	24.42%	-5.27%	7.48%
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	12.13%	22.41%	17.45%	22.27%	-18.39%	18.66%	16.34%	26.59%	-9.19%	24.33%

Correlation

The correlation between REET and ACWI is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2014	0.64

The correlation between REET and ACWI shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

REET vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	REET	ACWI
Real Estate	99.8%	1.8%
Financial Services	0.2%	16.1%
Basic Materials	-	3.7%
Communication Services	-	9.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	5.0%
Energy	-	4.2%
Healthcare	-	8.1%
Industrials	-	10.9%
Technology	-	29.4%
Utilities	-	2.6%

Return for Risk

REET vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REET

REET Risk / Return Rank: 28
REET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
REET Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
REET Omega Ratio Rank: 27
REET Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
REET Martin Ratio Rank: 32

ACWI

ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 66
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REET vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	REET	ACWI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.02	2.29	-1.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	3.17	-1.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.41	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.36	3.01	-1.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.89	13.53	-8.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

REET vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REET Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REET and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	REET	ACWI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.02	2.29	-1.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13	0.71	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21	0.75	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.43	-0.18

Drawdowns

REET vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REET drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REET and ACWI.

Drawdown Indicators

	REET	ACWI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.59%	-56.00%	+11.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.04%	-9.73%	+0.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.02%	-16.55%	-1.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.11%	-26.42%	-5.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.59%	-33.53%	-11.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.83%	-0.83%	-2.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.79%	-8.61%	-1.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.51%	2.16%	+0.35%

Volatility

REET vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) have volatilities of 3.79% and 3.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	REET	ACWI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.79%	3.93%	-0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.81%	10.29%	-1.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.10%	12.78%	-0.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.95%	16.05%	+0.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.84%	17.11%	+1.73%

REET vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

REET has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

REET vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

REET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than ACWI's 1.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	1.38%	1.55%	1.70%	1.88%	1.79%	1.71%	1.43%	2.33%	2.18%	1.94%	2.19%	2.56%
REET iShares Global REIT ETF	3.42%	3.67%	3.64%	3.27%	2.43%	3.18%	2.65%	5.25%	5.73%	3.84%	5.37%	3.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both REET and ACWI in my portfolio?

REET and ACWI have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, REET or ACWI?

ACWI has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to REET (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REET dropped -44.59% vs ACWI's -56.00%.

Which ETF is better, REET or ACWI?

On 10-year performance, ACWI leads with 12.85% vs 3.99% for REET. On fees, REET is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, REET has been the lower-risk option at 3.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, REET or ACWI?

Over the 10-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 12.85% return vs 3.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, REET or ACWI?

REET is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, REET or ACWI?

REET has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 1.38% for ACWI.

What is the main difference between REET and ACWI?

REET is categorized as REIT, while ACWI is Global Equities. REET tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for REET and 0.32% for ACWI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.