PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REEIX vs. COBYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REEIX vs. COBYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RBC Emerging Markets Equity Fund (REEIX) and The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REEIX achieves a 18.93% return, which is significantly higher than COBYX's 12.05% return. Over the past 10 years, REEIX has outperformed COBYX with an annualized return of 9.33%, while COBYX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.83% annualized return.


REEIX

1D
1.50%
1M
-0.05%
6M
10.87%
YTD
18.93%
1Y
40.60%
3Y*
18.82%
5Y*
9.77%
10Y*
9.33%
ALL TIME*
8.39%

COBYX

1D
0.20%
1M
0.61%
6M
7.82%
YTD
12.05%
1Y
20.86%
3Y*
8.07%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*
4.83%
ALL TIME*
4.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

REEIX vs. COBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REEIX
RBC Emerging Markets Equity Fund
18.93%34.54%6.38%12.20%-14.62%-4.36%16.76%17.26%-10.63%35.13%
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
12.05%20.50%-10.32%16.73%9.28%9.05%-10.97%9.40%-13.40%15.12%

Correlation

The correlation between REEIX and COBYX is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between REEIX and COBYX has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REEIX vs. COBYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

REEIX
REEIX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
REEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
REEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
REEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
REEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

COBYX
COBYX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
COBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
COBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
COBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
COBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

REEIX vs. COBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Emerging Markets Equity Fund (REEIX) and The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REEIXCOBYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.33

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

2.38

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.62

8.07

+0.55

REEIX vs. COBYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REEIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the COBYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REEIX and COBYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REEIX vs. COBYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REEIX drawdown since its inception was -35.90%, which is greater than COBYX's maximum drawdown of -34.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REEIX and COBYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REEIXCOBYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.90%

-34.18%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.07%

-8.95%

-6.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.32%

-16.29%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.18%

-17.10%

-12.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.90%

-34.18%

-1.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.69%

0.00%

-7.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.05%

-6.73%

-3.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.55%

2.66%

+1.89%

Volatility

REEIX vs. COBYX - Volatility Comparison

RBC Emerging Markets Equity Fund (REEIX) has a higher volatility of 9.89% compared to The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX) at 3.10%. This indicates that REEIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REEIXCOBYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.89%

3.10%

+6.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.37%

9.77%

+12.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.26%

11.81%

+12.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.47%

13.95%

+4.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.77%

13.67%

+4.10%

REEIX vs. COBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

REEIX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than COBYX's 1.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

REEIX vs. COBYX - Dividend Comparison

REEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than COBYX's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
1.05%1.18%0.00%1.01%1.16%2.18%0.32%0.69%12.60%1.88%5.09%0.00%
REEIX
RBC Emerging Markets Equity Fund
2.76%3.29%1.52%1.59%1.35%2.81%1.00%3.11%8.35%0.90%1.18%2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


REEIX and COBYX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REEIX has higher volatility (9.89%) compared to COBYX (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REEIX dropped -35.90% vs COBYX's -34.18%.

COBYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REEIX and COBYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer