REAI vs. DFAR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

REAI (Intelligent Real Estate ETF) and DFAR (Dimensional US Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, REAI returned 7.38%/yr vs 11.71%/yr for DFAR. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. REAI charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for DFAR.

Performance

REAI vs. DFAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intelligent Real Estate ETF (REAI) and Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with REAI having a 14.97% return and DFAR slightly higher at 15.09%.

REAI

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -0.63%
• YTD: 14.97%
• 6M: 15.33%
• 1Y: 11.93%
• 3Y*: 7.38%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DFAR

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: 15.09%
• 6M: 15.60%
• 1Y: 13.30%
• 3Y*: 11.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REAI vs. DFAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
REAI Intelligent Real Estate ETF	14.97%	-6.08%	8.00%	1.59%
DFAR Dimensional US Real Estate ETF	15.09%	1.31%	5.25%	10.01%

Correlation

The correlation between REAI and DFAR is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2023	0.86

The correlation between REAI and DFAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

REAI vs. DFAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REAI

REAI Risk / Return Rank: 23
REAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
REAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
REAI Omega Ratio Rank: 21
REAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
REAI Martin Ratio Rank: 23

DFAR

DFAR Risk / Return Rank: 30
DFAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
DFAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
DFAR Omega Ratio Rank: 26
DFAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
DFAR Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REAI vs. DFAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intelligent Real Estate ETF (REAI) and Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	REAI	DFAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.77	0.98	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.14	1.39	-0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.18	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.08	1.58	-0.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.75	4.95	-2.19

REAI vs. DFAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REAI Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is comparable to the DFAR Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REAI and DFAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

REAI vs. DFAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REAI drawdown since its inception was -22.29%, smaller than the maximum DFAR drawdown of -32.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REAI and DFAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	REAI	DFAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.29%	-32.27%	+9.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.08%	-8.43%	-2.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.29%	-17.64%	-4.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.14%	-1.31%	-0.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.21%	-14.05%	+6.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.34%	2.69%	+1.65%

Volatility

REAI vs. DFAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Intelligent Real Estate ETF (REAI) is 3.84%, while Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that REAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	REAI	DFAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.84%	5.04%	-1.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.64%	10.22%	+0.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.59%	13.74%	+1.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.00%	19.16%	-1.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.00%	19.16%	-1.16%

REAI vs. DFAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

REAI has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAR's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

REAI vs. DFAR - Dividend Comparison

REAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than DFAR's 2.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DFAR Dimensional US Real Estate ETF	2.68%	2.97%	2.89%	3.06%	1.69%
REAI Intelligent Real Estate ETF	3.22%	4.52%	3.34%	1.99%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both REAI and DFAR in my portfolio?

REAI and DFAR have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, REAI or DFAR?

DFAR has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to REAI (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REAI dropped -22.29% vs DFAR's -32.27%.

Which ETF is better, REAI or DFAR?

On 3-year performance, DFAR leads with 11.71% vs 7.38% for REAI. On fees, DFAR is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, REAI has been the lower-risk option at 3.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, REAI or DFAR?

Over the 3-year period, DFAR has performed better with a 11.71% return vs 7.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, REAI or DFAR?

DFAR is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REAI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, REAI or DFAR?

REAI has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 2.68% for DFAR.

What is the main difference between REAI and DFAR?

They also come from different issuers: Armada ETF Advisors and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for REAI and 0.19% for DFAR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.