PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REACX vs. IRFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REACX vs. IRFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Real Estate Fund (REACX) and Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REACX achieves a 9.52% return, which is significantly higher than IRFIX's -0.33% return. Over the past 10 years, REACX has outperformed IRFIX with an annualized return of 5.43%, while IRFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.64% annualized return.


REACX

1D
-1.83%
1M
-2.14%
YTD
9.52%
6M
8.19%
1Y
9.28%
3Y*
9.87%
5Y*
3.11%
10Y*
5.43%

IRFIX

1D
-1.62%
1M
-3.90%
YTD
-0.33%
6M
1.39%
1Y
6.71%
3Y*
5.41%
5Y*
-3.25%
10Y*
2.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REACX vs. IRFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REACX
American Century Real Estate Fund
9.52%0.81%7.63%10.97%-24.64%41.52%-8.31%30.73%-4.18%5.09%
IRFIX
Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund
-0.33%23.52%-10.56%4.58%-23.84%7.66%-0.81%23.74%-3.74%23.38%

Correlation

The correlation between REACX and IRFIX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2005

0.53

The correlation between REACX and IRFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REACX vs. IRFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REACX
REACX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
REACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
REACX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
REACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
REACX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

IRFIX
IRFIX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
IRFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
IRFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REACX vs. IRFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Real Estate Fund (REACX) and Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REACXIRFIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.74

0.57

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.07

0.92

+0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.11

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

0.57

+0.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.83

1.82

+2.01

REACX vs. IRFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REACX Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is comparable to the IRFIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REACX and IRFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REACXIRFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

0.57

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

-0.21

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.17

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.19

+0.16

Drawdowns

REACX vs. IRFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REACX drawdown since its inception was -75.80%, which is greater than IRFIX's maximum drawdown of -70.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REACX and IRFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REACXIRFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.80%

-70.13%

-5.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.72%

-14.85%

+7.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.16%

-21.06%

+3.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.15%

-38.41%

+6.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.88%

-39.51%

-2.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.67%

-16.97%

+13.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.59%

-18.66%

+6.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

4.67%

-2.16%

Volatility

REACX vs. IRFIX - Volatility Comparison

American Century Real Estate Fund (REACX) and Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund (IRFIX) have volatilities of 3.75% and 3.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REACXIRFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

3.88%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.29%

10.78%

-1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.91%

12.97%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.46%

15.33%

+3.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.49%

15.69%

+4.80%

REACX vs. IRFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

REACX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than IRFIX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

REACX vs. IRFIX - Dividend Comparison

REACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than IRFIX's 6.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IRFIX
Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund
6.19%6.17%3.24%2.62%2.62%7.70%3.40%9.81%4.19%3.37%6.46%3.36%
REACX
American Century Real Estate Fund
1.71%2.15%1.89%2.28%11.26%11.49%1.71%8.71%8.73%4.66%11.80%2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


REACX and IRFIX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IRFIX has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to REACX (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REACX dropped -75.80% vs IRFIX's -70.13%.

REACX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REACX and IRFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer