RDYY vs. IXC
RDYY (YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF) and IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RDYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. RDYY is actively managed, while IXC is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. RDYY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IXC.
Performance
RDYY vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDYY achieves a -23.45% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 22.29% return.
RDYY
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- 14.72%
- YTD
- -23.45%
- 6M
- -22.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IXC
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -8.68%
- YTD
- 22.29%
- 6M
- 23.05%
- 1Y
- 31.78%
- 3Y*
- 16.38%
- 5Y*
- 17.77%
- 10Y*
- 9.38%
RDYY vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RDYY YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF | -23.45% | -5.31% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 22.29% | 5.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDYY and IXC is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDYY vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank
RDYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IXC
RDYY vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF (RDYY) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDYY | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.40 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.40 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDYY vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDYY drawdown since its inception was -51.16%, smaller than the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDYY and IXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDYY | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.16% | -67.88% | +16.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.72% | -11.99% | -22.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.76% | -17.46% | -11.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.80% | — |
Volatility
RDYY vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDYY | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.54% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.93% | 19.16% | +35.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.93% | 23.48% | +31.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.93% | 26.83% | +28.10% |
RDYY vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDYY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than IXC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDYY vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
RDYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 92.82%, more than IXC's 3.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 3.11% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
RDYY YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF | 92.82% | 25.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDYY and IXC have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IXC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IXC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RDYY.
RDYY has the higher dividend yield at 92.82%, compared with 3.11% for IXC.
RDYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while IXC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RDYY and 0.40% for IXC.
Find the right allocation for RDYY and IXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer