RDYY vs. ARMW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RDYY (YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

RDYY vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF (RDYY) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDYY achieves a -22.78% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 363.23% return.

RDYY

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 2.65%
• YTD: -22.78%
• 6M: -20.14%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMW

• 1D: 3.44%
• 1M: 128.75%
• YTD: 363.23%
• 6M: 245.13%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDYY vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RDYY YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF	-22.78%	8.85%
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	363.23%	-40.49%

Correlation

The correlation between RDYY and ARMW is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025	0.28

Return for Risk

RDYY vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF (RDYY) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RDYY	ARMW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.67	4.96	-5.63

Drawdowns

RDYY vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDYY drawdown since its inception was -51.16%, which is greater than ARMW's maximum drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDYY and ARMW.

Drawdown Indicators

	RDYY	ARMW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.16%	-48.47%	-2.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.14%	0.00%	-34.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.62%	-26.55%	-2.07%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RDYY	ARMW	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.12%	88.46%	-34.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	54.12%	88.46%	-34.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.12%	88.46%	-34.34%

RDYY vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RDYY and ARMW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

RDYY vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

RDYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 83.18%, more than ARMW's 15.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	15.20%	16.38%
RDYY YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF	83.18%	25.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RDYY and ARMW in my portfolio?

RDYY and ARMW have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RDYY or ARMW?

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RDYY or ARMW?

RDYY and ARMW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RDYY or ARMW?

RDYY has the higher dividend yield at 83.18%, compared with 15.20% for ARMW.

What is the main difference between RDYY and ARMW?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill Investments.