RDVY vs. CALF
RDVY (First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF) and CALF (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RDVY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers, while CALF is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RDVY returned 12.03%/yr vs 3.80%/yr for CALF. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RDVY charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for CALF.
Performance
RDVY vs. CALF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDVY achieves a 13.41% return, which is significantly lower than CALF's 14.10% return.
RDVY
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 5.69%
- YTD
- 13.41%
- 6M
- 12.60%
- 1Y
- 31.20%
- 3Y*
- 20.46%
- 5Y*
- 12.03%
- 10Y*
- 16.29%
CALF
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 7.83%
- YTD
- 14.10%
- 6M
- 11.90%
- 1Y
- 30.59%
- 3Y*
- 9.56%
- 5Y*
- 3.80%
- 10Y*
- —
RDVY vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | 13.41% | 18.90% | 16.41% | 20.38% | -13.27% | 31.14% | 13.47% | 37.71% | -9.92% | 11.99% |
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 14.10% | 2.33% | -7.41% | 35.43% | -15.20% | 40.68% | 16.55% | 18.18% | -10.06% | 5.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDVY and CALF is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2017 | 0.81 |
The correlation between RDVY and CALF shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RDVY vs. CALF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RDVY
CALF
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
RDVY
CALF
Technology
RDVY
CALF
Consumer Cyclical
RDVY
CALF
Industrials
RDVY
CALF
Healthcare
RDVY
CALF
Communication Services
RDVY
CALF
Consumer Defensive
RDVY
CALF
Energy
RDVY
CALF
Utilities
RDVY
CALF
-
Basic Materials
RDVY
-
CALF
Real Estate
RDVY
-
CALF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDVY vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank
RDVY
CALF
RDVY vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDVY | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.33 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | 4.77 | -1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.71 | 13.43 | +0.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDVY vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDVY drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, smaller than the maximum CALF drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDVY and CALF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDVY | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.60% | -47.58% | +6.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.04% | -6.15% | -2.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.11% | -34.22% | +15.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.32% | -34.22% | +8.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.29% | +1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.99% | -10.71% | +5.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 2.18% | -0.03% |
Volatility
RDVY vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) have volatilities of 5.04% and 4.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDVY | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.04% | 4.93% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.50% | 10.67% | +0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.48% | 15.90% | -1.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.98% | 23.43% | -4.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.13% | 25.99% | -4.86% |
RDVY vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDVY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDVY vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison
RDVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than CALF's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.20% | 1.43% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 2.63% | 0.82% | 0.99% | 1.39% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | 0.89% | 1.11% | 1.64% | 2.09% | 2.21% | 1.04% | 1.53% | 1.55% | 1.68% | 1.25% | 2.07% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDVY and CALF have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDVY has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to CALF (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDVY dropped -40.60% vs CALF's -47.58%.
On 5-year performance, RDVY leads with 12.03% vs 3.80% for CALF. On fees, RDVY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, CALF has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RDVY has performed better with a 12.03% return vs 3.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RDVY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CALF.
CALF has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.89% for RDVY.
RDVY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CALF is Small Cap Blend Equities. RDVY tracks NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers, while CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RDVY and 0.59% for CALF.
RDVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDVY and CALF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer