RDVY vs. AFOS
RDVY (First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RDVY charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AFOS.
Performance
RDVY vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDVY achieves a 9.82% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 32.04% return.
RDVY
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- 9.82%
- 6M
- 10.80%
- 1Y
- 26.23%
- 3Y*
- 20.29%
- 5Y*
- 11.01%
- 10Y*
- 15.66%
AFOS
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 8.94%
- YTD
- 32.04%
- 6M
- 37.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RDVY vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | 9.82% | 12.45% |
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 32.04% | 36.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDVY and AFOS is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDVY vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank
RDVY
AFOS
RDVY vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RDVY | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.88 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.71 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.26 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RDVY | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 4.35 | -3.69 |
Drawdowns
RDVY vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDVY drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDVY and AFOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDVY | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.60% | -11.52% | -29.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -0.29% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.00% | -1.37% | -3.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | — | — |
Volatility
RDVY vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDVY | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.02% | 20.19% | -6.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.92% | 20.19% | -1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.11% | 20.19% | +0.92% |
RDVY vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDVY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDVY vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison
RDVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, more than AFOS's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | 0.92% | 1.11% | 1.64% | 2.09% | 2.21% | 1.04% | 1.53% | 1.55% | 1.68% | 1.25% | 2.07% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDVY and AFOS have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RDVY.
RDVY has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RDVY and 0.45% for AFOS.
Find the right allocation for RDVY and AFOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer