PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDVT vs. TXN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RDVT vs. TXN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) and Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDVT achieves a -6.08% return, which is significantly lower than TXN's 69.63% return.


RDVT

1D
1.00%
1M
7.63%
YTD
-6.08%
6M
-3.98%
1Y
17.20%
3Y*
36.51%
5Y*
19.97%
10Y*

TXN

1D
2.05%
1M
1.08%
YTD
69.63%
6M
62.64%
1Y
55.42%
3Y*
23.02%
5Y*
12.46%
10Y*
19.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDVT vs. TXN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RDVT
Red Violet, Inc.
-6.08%58.63%81.27%-13.25%-42.00%52.01%41.06%174.63%-85.47%
TXN
Texas Instruments Incorporated
69.63%-4.47%13.14%6.41%-9.86%17.53%31.70%39.56%-9.55%

Correlation

The correlation between RDVT and TXN is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2018

0.24

Over the past year, the correlation between RDVT and TXN has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.24, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RDVT:

$769.95M

TXN:

$265.88B

EPS

RDVT:

$0.97

TXN:

$5.88

PE Ratio

RDVT:

54.97

TXN:

49.50

PS Ratio

RDVT:

8.24

TXN:

14.41

PB Ratio

RDVT:

7.37

TXN:

15.85

Total Revenue (TTM)

RDVT:

$94.08M

TXN:

$18.44B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RDVT:

$79.25M

TXN:

$10.57B

EBITDA (TTM)

RDVT:

$23.76M

TXN:

$8.21B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDVT vs. TXN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDVT
RDVT Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
RDVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVT Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVT Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

TXN
TXN Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
TXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
TXN Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
TXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
TXN Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDVT vs. TXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) and Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RDVTTXNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.30

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

1.88

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.91

3.94

-3.03

RDVT vs. TXN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDVT Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the TXN Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDVT and TXN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RDVTTXNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

1.40

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.39

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.30

-0.27

Drawdowns

RDVT vs. TXN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDVT drawdown since its inception was -90.17%, which is greater than TXN's maximum drawdown of -85.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDVT and TXN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDVTTXNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.17%

-85.81%

-4.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.11%

-29.57%

-12.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.11%

-33.41%

-8.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.73%

-33.41%

-30.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.98%

-10.46%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.47%

-34.79%

-15.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.92%

14.11%

+4.81%

Volatility

RDVT vs. TXN - Volatility Comparison

Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) has a higher volatility of 15.61% compared to Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) at 13.93%. This indicates that RDVT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TXN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDVTTXNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.61%

13.93%

+1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.64%

30.98%

+6.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.14%

39.96%

+6.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.36%

32.33%

+17.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.31%

31.13%

+37.18%

Dividends

RDVT vs. TXN - Dividend Comparison

RDVT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RDVT
Red Violet, Inc.
0.00%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TXN
Texas Instruments Incorporated
1.93%3.17%2.81%2.94%2.84%2.23%2.27%2.50%2.78%2.03%2.25%2.55%

Financials

RDVT vs. TXN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Red Violet, Inc. and Texas Instruments Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
25.83M
4.83B
(RDVT) Total Revenue
(TXN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RDVT vs. TXN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Red Violet, Inc. and Texas Instruments Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
85.2%
58.0%
Portfolio components
RDVT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Red Violet, Inc. reported a gross profit of 22.01M and revenue of 25.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.2%.

TXN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Instruments Incorporated reported a gross profit of 2.80B and revenue of 4.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.0%.

RDVT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Red Violet, Inc. reported an operating income of 5.44M and revenue of 25.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.

TXN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Instruments Incorporated reported an operating income of 1.81B and revenue of 4.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.5%.

RDVT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Red Violet, Inc. reported a net income of 4.39M and revenue of 25.83M, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.

TXN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Instruments Incorporated reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 4.83B, resulting in a net margin of 32.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RDVT and TXN have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDVT has higher volatility (15.61%) compared to TXN (13.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDVT dropped -90.17% vs TXN's -85.81%.

TXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDVT and TXN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer