PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RDVT vs. EMXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RDVT vs. EMXC

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RDVT (Red Violet, Inc.) is a stock, while EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) is Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Over the past 5 years, RDVT returned 19.76%/yr vs 12.47%/yr for EMXC. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RDVT vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDVT achieves a -5.03% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 39.90% return.

RDVT

1D
1.36%
1M
33.81%
YTD
-5.03%
6M
1.84%
1Y
17.50%
3Y*
40.72%
5Y*
19.76%
10Y*
—

EMXC

1D
-1.28%
1M
8.45%
YTD
39.90%
6M
45.10%
1Y
73.97%
3Y*
28.52%
5Y*
12.47%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDVT vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RDVT
Red Violet, Inc.		-5.03%58.63%81.27%-13.25%-42.00%52.01%41.06%174.63%-85.47%
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF		39.90%35.14%2.68%18.96%-19.56%8.54%12.76%15.80%-14.24%

Correlation

The correlation between RDVT and EMXC is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2018

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Red Violet, Inc.

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF

Often compared with RDVT:
RDVT vs. QQQRDVT vs. PATHRDVT vs. LINERDVT vs. FHLCRDVT vs. KULRRDVT vs. REGRDVT vs. QDTE
Often compared with EMXC:
EMXC vs. XCEMEMXC vs. IEMGEMXC vs. VWOEMXC vs. EEMEMXC vs. SPEMEMXC vs. VEXCEMXC vs. VNM

Return for Risk

RDVT vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
RDVT
RDVT Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
RDVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVT Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVT Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
EMXC
EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDVT vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

RDVTEMXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.38
3.42

-3.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.84
4.21

-3.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.60

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

5.16

-4.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.93

20.85

-19.92

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RDVT vs. EMXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDVT Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the EMXC Sharpe Ratio of 3.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDVT and EMXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

RDVTEMXCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

3.42

-3.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.72

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.54

-0.51

Drawdowns

RDVT vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDVT drawdown since its inception was -90.17%, which is greater than EMXC's maximum drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDVT and EMXC.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RDVTEMXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.17%

-42.81%

-47.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.11%

-14.41%

-27.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.11%

-19.12%

-22.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.73%

-28.91%

-34.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.98%

-2.27%

-6.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.51%

-10.19%

-40.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.90%

3.56%

+15.34%

Volatility

RDVT vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison

Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) has a higher volatility of 20.18% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) at 9.83%. This indicates that RDVT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RDVTEMXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.18%

9.83%

+10.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.89%

19.41%

+18.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.21%

21.75%

+24.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.36%

17.45%

+31.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.34%

19.82%

+48.52%

Dividends

RDVT vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison

RDVT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF		2.01%2.82%2.69%1.83%2.85%1.78%1.45%3.25%2.63%0.99%
RDVT
Red Violet, Inc.		0.00%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

RDVT and EMXC have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDVT has higher volatility (20.18%) compared to EMXC (9.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDVT dropped -90.17% vs EMXC's -42.81%.

EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDVT and EMXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer