RDVI vs. BIZD

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

RDVI (FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF) and BIZD (VanEck BDC Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RDVI is a Derivative Income fund tracking the NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers, while BIZD is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RDVI returned 18.87%/yr vs 5.47%/yr for BIZD. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RDVI charges 0.75%/yr vs 12.86%/yr for BIZD.

Performance

RDVI vs. BIZD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDVI achieves a 13.14% return, which is significantly higher than BIZD's -6.86% return.

RDVI

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 6.73%
• YTD: 13.14%
• 6M: 12.37%
• 1Y: 29.70%
• 3Y*: 18.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BIZD

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 0.79%
• YTD: -6.86%
• 6M: -8.47%
• 1Y: -11.02%
• 3Y*: 5.47%
• 5Y*: 4.25%
• 10Y*: 8.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDVI vs. BIZD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
RDVI FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF	13.14%	17.93%	14.56%	18.63%	8.29%
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF	-6.86%	-4.96%	15.63%	27.02%	4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between RDVI and BIZD is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2022	0.59

The correlation between RDVI and BIZD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

RDVI vs. BIZD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RDVI	BIZD
Financial Services	33.5%	100.0%
Technology	26.9%	-
Industrials	13.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.9%	-
Communication Services	5.5%	-
Healthcare	3.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	-
Energy	2.4%	-
Utilities	1.4%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

RDVI vs. BIZD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDVI

RDVI Risk / Return Rank: 76
RDVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
RDVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
RDVI Omega Ratio Rank: 72
RDVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
RDVI Martin Ratio Rank: 82

BIZD

BIZD Risk / Return Rank: 5
BIZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BIZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BIZD Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BIZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
BIZD Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDVI vs. BIZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RDVI	BIZD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	-0.64	+2.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.97	-0.82	+3.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	0.91	+0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.36	-0.53	+3.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.17	-0.91	+15.08

RDVI vs. BIZD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDVI Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the BIZD Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDVI and BIZD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RDVI vs. BIZD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDVI drawdown since its inception was -18.35%, smaller than the maximum BIZD drawdown of -55.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDVI and BIZD.

Drawdown Indicators

	RDVI	BIZD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.35%	-55.44%	+37.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.48%	-22.22%	+13.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.35%	-22.56%	+4.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.91%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-55.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-17.39%	+17.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.15%	-6.74%	+3.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	12.97%	-10.96%

Volatility

RDVI vs. BIZD - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF (RDVI) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) have volatilities of 4.89% and 4.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RDVI	BIZD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.89%	4.92%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.07%	14.97%	-3.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.78%	18.32%	-4.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.98%	17.44%	-0.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.98%	21.75%	-4.77%

RDVI vs. BIZD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDVI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BIZD's 12.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

RDVI vs. BIZD - Dividend Comparison

RDVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.68%, less than BIZD's 13.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF	13.56%	11.78%	10.94%	10.96%	11.21%	8.14%	10.39%	9.13%	10.88%	9.13%	8.51%	9.12%
RDVI FT Cboe Vest Rising Dividend Achievers Target Income ETF	7.68%	8.10%	8.62%	8.45%	1.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RDVI and BIZD in my portfolio?

RDVI and BIZD have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RDVI or BIZD?

BIZD has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to RDVI (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDVI dropped -18.35% vs BIZD's -55.44%.

Which ETF is better, RDVI or BIZD?

On 3-year performance, RDVI leads with 18.87% vs 5.47% for BIZD. On fees, RDVI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RDVI or BIZD?

Over the 3-year period, RDVI has performed better with a 18.87% return vs 5.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RDVI or BIZD?

RDVI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 12.86% for BIZD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RDVI or BIZD?

BIZD has the higher dividend yield at 13.56%, compared with 7.68% for RDVI.

What is the main difference between RDVI and BIZD?

RDVI is categorized as Derivative Income, while BIZD is Financials Equities. RDVI tracks NASDAQ US Rising Dividend Achievers, while BIZD tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RDVI and 12.86% for BIZD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RDVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.