RDTY vs. RBIL

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

RDTY (YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RDTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. RDTY is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. Over the past year, RDTY returned 24.02% vs 4.20% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. RDTY charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

RDTY vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDTY achieves a 19.26% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.66% return.

RDTY

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 5.07%
• 6M: 15.13%
• YTD: 19.26%
• 1Y: 24.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.08%
• 6M: 2.48%
• YTD: 2.66%
• 1Y: 4.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDTY vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RDTY YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	19.26%	10.93%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.66%	2.81%

Correlation

The correlation between RDTY and RBIL is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025	-0.19

Return for Risk

RDTY vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDTY

RDTY Risk / Return Rank: 52
RDTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
RDTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
RDTY Omega Ratio Rank: 43
RDTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
RDTY Martin Ratio Rank: 60

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 97
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDTY vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RDTY	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	4.54	-3.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	7.04	-5.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	2.20	-0.98
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.48	7.57	-5.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.34	32.59	-24.25

RDTY vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 4.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDTY and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RDTY vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDTY drawdown since its inception was -17.31%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDTY and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	RDTY	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.31%	-0.56%	-16.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.20%	-0.56%	-8.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.50%	-0.17%	-0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.60%	-0.08%	-2.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.74%	0.13%	+2.61%

Volatility

RDTY vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY) has a higher volatility of 4.38% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.33%. This indicates that RDTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RDTY	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.38%	0.33%	+4.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.21%	0.86%	+12.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.34%	0.94%	+16.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.79%	1.06%	+20.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.79%	1.06%	+20.73%

RDTY vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDTY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

RDTY vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

RDTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.70%, more than RBIL's 4.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.37%	3.65%
RDTY YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	42.70%	36.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RDTY and RBIL in my portfolio?

RDTY and RBIL have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RDTY or RBIL?

RDTY has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to RBIL (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDTY dropped -17.31% vs RBIL's -0.56%.

Which ETF is better, RDTY or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, RDTY leads with 24.02% vs 4.20% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RDTY or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, RDTY has performed better with a 24.02% return vs 4.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RDTY or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for RDTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RDTY or RBIL?

RDTY has the higher dividend yield at 42.70%, compared with 4.37% for RBIL.

What is the main difference between RDTY and RBIL?

RDTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and F/m. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for RDTY and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.54 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.