PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDTY vs. GOOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDTY vs. GOOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDTY achieves a 13.72% return, which is significantly lower than GOOP's 17.17% return.


RDTY

1D
0.72%
1M
1.49%
YTD
13.72%
6M
13.39%
1Y
25.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GOOP

1D
4.28%
1M
-4.63%
YTD
17.17%
6M
16.35%
1Y
100.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDTY vs. GOOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RDTY and GOOP is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDTY vs. GOOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDTY
RDTY Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
RDTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDTY Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
RDTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDTY Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOP
GOOP Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GOOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOP Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOP Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDTY vs. GOOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RDTYGOOPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.59

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

4.31

-1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.38

16.36

-6.98

RDTY vs. GOOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the GOOP Sharpe Ratio of 3.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDTY and GOOP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RDTYGOOPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

3.53

-2.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

1.59

-0.66

Drawdowns

RDTY vs. GOOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDTY drawdown since its inception was -17.31%, smaller than the maximum GOOP drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDTY and GOOP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDTYGOOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.31%

-27.49%

+10.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.20%

-23.32%

+14.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-8.13%

+7.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.74%

-6.29%

+3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

6.14%

-3.41%

Volatility

RDTY vs. GOOP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTY) is 5.92%, while Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP) has a volatility of 10.02%. This indicates that RDTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDTYGOOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.92%

10.02%

-4.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.45%

22.96%

-10.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.98%

28.55%

-11.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.05%

26.02%

-3.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.05%

26.02%

-3.97%

RDTY vs. GOOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDTY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than GOOP's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDTY vs. GOOP - Dividend Comparison

RDTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.97%, more than GOOP's 11.75% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GOOP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF
11.75%11.79%13.73%2.06%
RDTY
YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
43.97%36.75%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDTY and GOOP have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOOP has higher volatility (10.02%) compared to RDTY (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDTY dropped -17.31% vs GOOP's -27.49%.

On 1-year performance, GOOP leads with 100.07% vs 25.49% for RDTY. On fees, GOOP is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, RDTY has been the lower-risk option at 5.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GOOP has performed better with a 100.07% return vs 25.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GOOP is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for RDTY.

RDTY has the higher dividend yield at 43.97%, compared with 11.75% for GOOP.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for RDTY and 0.99% for GOOP.

GOOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDTY and GOOP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer