RDTL vs. NVD

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

RDTL (GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF) and NVD (GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RDTL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while NVD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RDTL returned -31.28% vs -53.87% for NVD. At a correlation of -0.32, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 1.50% expense ratio.

Performance

RDTL vs. NVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF (RDTL) and GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDTL achieves a -65.26% return, which is significantly lower than NVD's -23.92% return.

RDTL

• 1D: -3.81%
• 1M: 10.73%
• YTD: -65.26%
• 6M: -64.18%
• 1Y: -31.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVD

• 1D: 3.23%
• 1M: 15.01%
• YTD: -23.92%
• 6M: -22.14%
• 1Y: -53.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDTL vs. NVD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RDTL GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF	-65.26%	104.22%
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF	-23.92%	-71.36%

Correlation

The correlation between RDTL and NVD is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2025	-0.32

RDTL vs. NVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RDTL	NVD
Communication Services	66.7%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	199.7%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RDTL vs. NVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDTL

RDTL Risk / Return Rank: 9
RDTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
RDTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
RDTL Omega Ratio Rank: 12
RDTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
RDTL Martin Ratio Rank: 7

NVD

NVD Risk / Return Rank: 3
NVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
NVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
NVD Omega Ratio Rank: 4
NVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
NVD Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDTL vs. NVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF (RDTL) and GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RDTL	NVD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.24	-0.76	+0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.54	-1.02	+1.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	0.89	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.37	-0.81	+0.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.56	-1.33	+0.77

RDTL vs. NVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDTL Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is higher than the NVD Sharpe Ratio of -0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDTL and NVD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RDTL vs. NVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDTL drawdown since its inception was -85.21%, smaller than the maximum NVD drawdown of -99.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDTL and NVD.

Drawdown Indicators

	RDTL	NVD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.21%	-99.26%	+14.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-85.21%	-66.81%	-18.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-78.85%	-98.98%	+20.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.13%	-81.90%	+36.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	55.96%	40.42%	+15.54%

Volatility

RDTL vs. NVD - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF (RDTL) has a higher volatility of 47.91% compared to GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) at 26.63%. This indicates that RDTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RDTL	NVD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	47.91%	26.63%	+21.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	95.82%	54.05%	+41.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	131.50%	71.16%	+60.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	142.74%	92.48%	+50.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	142.74%	92.48%	+50.26%

RDTL vs. NVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RDTL and NVD have an expense ratio of 1.50%.

Dividends

RDTL vs. NVD - Dividend Comparison

RDTL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.54%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF	15.54%	11.83%	8.68%	15.78%
RDTL GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RDTL and NVD in my portfolio?

RDTL and NVD have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RDTL or NVD?

RDTL has higher volatility (47.91%) compared to NVD (26.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDTL dropped -85.21% vs NVD's -99.26%.

Which ETF is better, RDTL or NVD?

On 1-year performance, RDTL leads with -31.28% vs -53.87% for NVD. Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. On volatility, NVD has been the lower-risk option at 26.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RDTL or NVD?

Over the 1-year period, RDTL has performed better with a -31.28% return vs -53.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RDTL or NVD?

RDTL and NVD have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RDTL or NVD?

NVD has the higher dividend yield at 15.54%, compared with 0.00% for RDTL.

What is the main difference between RDTL and NVD?

RDTL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NVD is Inverse Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RDTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.24 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.