PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDTL vs. LINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDTL vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF (RDTL) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDTL achieves a -61.77% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 744.89% return.


RDTL

1D
-6.16%
1M
27.13%
YTD
-61.77%
6M
-60.64%
1Y
-15.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LINT

1D
-12.86%
1M
11.99%
YTD
744.89%
6M
773.46%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDTL vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
RDTL
GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF
-61.77%45.92%
LINT
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares
744.89%5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between RDTL and LINT is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

0.06

RDTL vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RDTL
LINT

Communication Services

66.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

100.0%

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

RDTL
66.7%
LINT

-

Basic Materials

RDTL

-

LINT

-

Consumer Cyclical

RDTL

-

LINT

-

Consumer Defensive

RDTL

-

LINT

-

Energy

RDTL

-

LINT

-

Financial Services

RDTL

-

LINT

-

Healthcare

RDTL

-

LINT

-

Industrials

RDTL

-

LINT

-

Real Estate

RDTL

-

LINT

-

Technology

RDTL

-

LINT
100.0%

Utilities

RDTL

-

LINT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDTL vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDTL
RDTL Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
RDTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDTL Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
RDTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDTL Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDTL vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long RDDT Daily ETF (RDTL) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RDTLLINTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.29

RDTL vs. LINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RDTL vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDTL drawdown since its inception was -85.21%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDTL and LINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDTLLINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.21%

-49.54%

-35.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-85.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.73%

-12.86%

-63.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.92%

-20.48%

-24.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

55.52%

Volatility

RDTL vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDTLLINTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

49.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

95.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

131.93%

168.83%

-36.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

143.06%

168.83%

-25.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

143.06%

168.83%

-25.77%

RDTL vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDTL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDTL vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

RDTL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RDTL and LINT have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for RDTL.

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.00% for RDTL.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for RDTL and 0.97% for LINT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDTL and LINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer