RDOG vs. XLRI
RDOG (ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF) and XLRI (State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RDOG is a REIT fund tracking the S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index, while XLRI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. RDOG is passively managed, while XLRI is actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
RDOG vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDOG achieves a 17.52% return, which is significantly higher than XLRI's 6.71% return.
RDOG
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- 17.52%
- 6M
- 19.48%
- 1Y
- 20.13%
- 3Y*
- 13.65%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- 4.49%
XLRI
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 6.71%
- 6M
- 7.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RDOG vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF | 17.52% | 2.20% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 6.71% | -0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDOG and XLRI is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDOG vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank
RDOG
XLRI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RDOG vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDOG | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.52 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDOG vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDOG drawdown since its inception was -67.59%, which is greater than XLRI's maximum drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDOG and XLRI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDOG | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.59% | -7.12% | -60.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -0.54% | -0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.23% | -1.65% | -10.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | — | — |
Volatility
RDOG vs. XLRI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDOG | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.55% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.04% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.91% | 10.99% | +3.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 10.99% | +8.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.05% | 10.99% | +12.06% |
RDOG vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RDOG and XLRI have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
RDOG vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison
RDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.21%, less than XLRI's 12.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF | 6.21% | 6.91% | 6.11% | 7.07% | 5.25% | 3.11% | 5.12% | 3.10% | 3.13% | 3.64% | 3.66% | 3.43% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 12.24% | 6.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDOG and XLRI have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RDOG and XLRI have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
XLRI has the higher dividend yield at 12.24%, compared with 6.21% for RDOG.
RDOG is categorized as REIT, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and State Street.
Find the right allocation for RDOG and XLRI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer