RDOG vs. RWR
RDOG (ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF) and RWR (SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF) are both REIT funds - RDOG tracks the S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index while RWR tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RDOG returned 4.49%/yr vs 5.51%/yr for RWR. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RDOG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for RWR.
Performance
RDOG vs. RWR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDOG achieves a 17.52% return, which is significantly higher than RWR's 16.14% return. Over the past 10 years, RDOG has underperformed RWR with an annualized return of 4.49%, while RWR has yielded a comparatively higher 5.51% annualized return.
RDOG
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- 17.52%
- 6M
- 19.48%
- 1Y
- 20.13%
- 3Y*
- 13.65%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- 4.49%
RWR
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 16.14%
- 6M
- 16.59%
- 1Y
- 19.02%
- 3Y*
- 13.63%
- 5Y*
- 4.96%
- 10Y*
- 5.51%
RDOG vs. RWR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF | 17.52% | 0.95% | 4.57% | 10.38% | -25.53% | 34.42% | -10.01% | 21.54% | -5.70% | 11.84% |
RWR SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF | 16.14% | 3.20% | 7.74% | 13.76% | -26.09% | 45.47% | -11.40% | 22.71% | -4.47% | 3.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDOG and RWR is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2008 | 0.79 |
The correlation between RDOG and RWR shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDOG vs. RWR — Risk / Return Rank
RDOG
RWR
RDOG vs. RWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) and SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDOG | RWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.24 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 2.38 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.52 | 8.03 | -1.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDOG vs. RWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDOG drawdown since its inception was -67.59%, smaller than the maximum RWR drawdown of -74.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDOG and RWR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDOG | RWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.59% | -74.92% | +7.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.02% | -8.04% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.40% | -18.85% | -2.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.52% | -32.58% | -2.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.35% | -44.39% | -4.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -0.46% | -0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.23% | -13.08% | +0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 2.38% | +0.72% |
Volatility
RDOG vs. RWR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) is 4.55%, while SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that RDOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDOG | RWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.55% | 5.42% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.04% | 10.37% | +0.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.91% | 14.05% | +0.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 19.05% | +0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.05% | 21.55% | +1.50% |
RDOG vs. RWR - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDOG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than RWR's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDOG vs. RWR - Dividend Comparison
RDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.21%, more than RWR's 3.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF | 6.21% | 6.91% | 6.11% | 7.07% | 5.25% | 3.11% | 5.12% | 3.10% | 3.13% | 3.64% | 3.66% | 3.43% |
RWR SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF | 3.36% | 3.78% | 3.76% | 3.75% | 3.81% | 2.79% | 3.73% | 3.36% | 4.19% | 3.05% | 4.39% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDOG and RWR have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RWR has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to RDOG (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDOG dropped -67.59% vs RWR's -74.92%.
On 10-year performance, RWR leads with 5.51% vs 4.49% for RDOG. On fees, RWR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, RDOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RWR has performed better with a 5.51% return vs 4.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RWR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RDOG.
RDOG has the higher dividend yield at 6.21%, compared with 3.36% for RWR.
RDOG tracks S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index, while RWR tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RDOG and 0.25% for RWR.
RWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDOG and RWR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer