PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDOG vs. FRI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDOG vs. FRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) and First Trust S&P REIT Index Fund (FRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDOG achieves a 13.77% return, which is significantly higher than FRI's 11.90% return. Over the past 10 years, RDOG has underperformed FRI with an annualized return of 4.05%, while FRI has yielded a comparatively higher 5.62% annualized return.


RDOG

1D
-0.80%
1M
3.92%
YTD
13.77%
6M
14.44%
1Y
20.06%
3Y*
11.40%
5Y*
2.28%
10Y*
4.05%

FRI

1D
0.21%
1M
-0.46%
YTD
11.90%
6M
10.60%
1Y
14.73%
3Y*
11.09%
5Y*
4.41%
10Y*
5.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDOG vs. FRI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RDOG
ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF
13.77%0.95%4.57%10.38%-25.53%34.42%-10.01%21.54%-5.70%11.84%
FRI
First Trust S&P REIT Index Fund
11.90%2.80%7.84%13.33%-24.66%42.55%-7.90%23.67%-4.28%3.86%

Correlation

The correlation between RDOG and FRI is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2008

0.79

The correlation between RDOG and FRI shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RDOG vs. FRI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RDOG
FRI

Real Estate

100.0%
96.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

2.3%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

0.8%

Real Estate

RDOG
100.0%
FRI
96.2%

Basic Materials

RDOG

-

FRI

-

Communication Services

RDOG

-

FRI

-

Consumer Cyclical

RDOG

-

FRI

-

Consumer Defensive

RDOG

-

FRI

-

Energy

RDOG

-

FRI

-

Financial Services

RDOG

-

FRI
2.3%

Healthcare

RDOG

-

FRI

-

Industrials

RDOG

-

FRI

-

Technology

RDOG

-

FRI

-

Utilities

RDOG

-

FRI
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDOG vs. FRI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDOG
RDOG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
RDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
RDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

FRI
FRI Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRI Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRI Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDOG vs. FRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) and First Trust S&P REIT Index Fund (FRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RDOGFRIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.20

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

1.95

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.51

6.21

+0.29

RDOG vs. FRI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the FRI Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDOG and FRI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RDOGFRIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

1.13

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.24

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.27

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.18

-0.01

Drawdowns

RDOG vs. FRI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDOG drawdown since its inception was -67.59%, smaller than the maximum FRI drawdown of -71.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDOG and FRI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDOGFRIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.59%

-71.95%

+4.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.02%

-7.57%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.40%

-18.90%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.52%

-31.21%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.35%

-44.16%

-5.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.03%

-3.24%

+1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.26%

-13.70%

+1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

2.38%

+0.71%

Volatility

RDOG vs. FRI - Volatility Comparison

ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) and First Trust S&P REIT Index Fund (FRI) have volatilities of 3.98% and 3.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDOGFRIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

3.93%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.42%

9.14%

+1.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.52%

13.05%

+1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.84%

18.65%

+1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.05%

21.06%

+1.99%

RDOG vs. FRI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDOG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FRI's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDOG vs. FRI - Dividend Comparison

RDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.13%, more than FRI's 2.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRI
First Trust S&P REIT Index Fund
2.60%2.99%3.33%3.24%2.52%1.44%3.08%2.28%3.21%2.82%3.27%2.66%
RDOG
ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF
6.13%6.91%6.11%7.07%5.25%3.11%5.12%3.10%3.13%3.64%3.66%3.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDOG and FRI have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDOG has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to FRI (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDOG dropped -67.59% vs FRI's -71.95%.

On 10-year performance, FRI leads with 5.62% vs 4.05% for RDOG. On fees, RDOG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FRI has performed better with a 5.62% return vs 4.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RDOG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FRI.

RDOG has the higher dividend yield at 6.13%, compared with 2.60% for FRI.

RDOG tracks S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index, while FRI tracks S&P United States REIT. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RDOG and 0.50% for FRI.

RDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDOG and FRI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer