RDOG vs. DBO
RDOG (ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - RDOG is a REIT fund tracking the S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RDOG returned 3.94%/yr vs 11.43%/yr for DBO. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RDOG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
RDOG vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDOG achieves a 19.44% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 66.72% return. Over the past 10 years, RDOG has underperformed DBO with an annualized return of 3.94%, while DBO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.43% annualized return.
RDOG
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- 6M
- 16.33%
- YTD
- 19.44%
- 1Y
- 26.15%
- 3Y*
- 11.18%
- 5Y*
- 2.74%
- 10Y*
- 3.94%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.40%
DBO
- 1D
- -5.53%
- 1M
- 17.71%
- 6M
- 53.16%
- YTD
- 66.72%
- 1Y
- 51.44%
- 3Y*
- 12.33%
- 5Y*
- 13.64%
- 10Y*
- 11.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $11.34M | $10.71M | $13.49M | |
| $34.91K | $53.92K | $54.08K |
RDOG vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF | 19.44% | 0.95% | 4.57% | 10.38% | -25.53% | 34.42% | -10.01% | 21.54% | -5.70% | 11.84% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 66.72% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | 60.74% | -20.99% | 28.05% | -15.22% | 4.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDOG and DBO is -0.22, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2008 | 0.23 |
The correlation between RDOG and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDOG vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
RDOG
DBO
RDOG vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDOG | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.23 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 1.86 | +0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.82 | 5.64 | +3.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDOG vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDOG drawdown since its inception was -67.59%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDOG and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDOG | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.59% | -90.18% | +22.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.02% | -27.73% | +17.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.40% | -28.20% | +6.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.52% | -37.68% | +2.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.35% | -61.69% | +12.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.17% | -56.13% | +53.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.16% | -62.20% | +50.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 9.16% | -6.19% |
Volatility
RDOG vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) is 4.00%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 18.99%. This indicates that RDOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDOG | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 18.99% | -14.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.17% | 34.30% | -23.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.65% | 38.86% | -24.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.81% | 33.43% | -13.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.05% | 32.24% | -9.19% |
RDOG vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDOG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDOG vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
RDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, more than DBO's 2.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 2.11% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF | 6.11% | 6.91% | 6.11% | 7.07% | 5.25% | 3.11% | 5.12% | 3.10% | 3.13% | 3.64% | 3.66% | 3.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDOG and DBO have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (18.99%) compared to RDOG (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDOG dropped -67.59% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 10-year performance, DBO leads with 11.43% vs 3.94% for RDOG. On fees, RDOG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RDOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBO has performed better with a 11.43% return vs 3.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RDOG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
RDOG has the higher dividend yield at 6.11%, compared with 2.11% for DBO.
RDOG is categorized as REIT, while DBO is Oil & Gas. RDOG tracks S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RDOG and 0.78% for DBO.
RDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDOG and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer